starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Detailed view of Tenants show unrelated contacts #8142

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:33:01 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:33:01 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jbakklund on GitHub (May 31, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.5.2

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create some sites, tenants, and contacts.
  2. Ensure that there are no contacts assigned to tenant number 1 at /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/
  3. Add contacts to site number 1 at /dcim/sites/1/contacts/
  4. Navigate to /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/

Expected Behavior

No contacts should be listed.

Observed Behavior

All contacts related to Site-ID 1 are listed under Tenant-ID 1.

Originally created by @jbakklund on GitHub (May 31, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.5.2 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create some sites, tenants, and contacts. 2. Ensure that there are no contacts assigned to tenant number 1 at /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/ 3. Add contacts to site number 1 at /dcim/sites/1/contacts/ 4. Navigate to /tenancy/tenants/1/contacts/ ### Expected Behavior No contacts should be listed. ### Observed Behavior All contacts related to Site-ID 1 are listed under Tenant-ID 1.
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 20:33:01 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:33:01 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:33:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jbakklund commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023):

Looks like the same Contacts related to a specific Site-ID also will be misinterpreted as contacts for an eventual Circuit Provider with Provider-ID equal to the Site-ID.

@jbakklund commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023): Looks like the same Contacts related to a specific Site-ID also will be misinterpreted as contacts for an eventual Circuit Provider with Provider-ID equal to the Site-ID.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:33:02 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023):

Duplicate of #12730

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (May 31, 2023): Duplicate of #12730
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: duplicate
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8142
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?