starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Bulk update data type is incorrect in swagger spec #7229

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @abhi1693 on GitHub (Nov 15, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @abhi1693 on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.3.7

Python version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

As per the swagger doc, the bulk payload requires a dict
image

However, when trying to run the same, it throws an error

image

The issue is seen for all models in the spec for PUT and PATCH using the bulk operations

Expected Behavior

The spec should display that the required payload should be a List of items/dictionaries

Observed Behavior

The spec displays it needs a dictionary

Originally created by @abhi1693 on GitHub (Nov 15, 2022). Originally assigned to: @abhi1693 on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.3.7 ### Python version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce As per the swagger doc, the bulk payload requires a dict ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5083532/201976485-b0f1178f-66ec-487d-9fac-7c1ed3936804.png) However, when trying to run the same, it throws an error ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5083532/201976682-21121789-fe6e-49a8-bc3d-0576a8696c14.png) The issue is seen for all models in the spec for PUT and PATCH using the bulk operations ### Expected Behavior The spec should display that the required payload should be a List of items/dictionaries ### Observed Behavior The spec displays it needs a dictionary
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2023):

@jeremystretch @arthanson @kkthxbye-code I'd like to take this

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2023): @jeremystretch @arthanson @kkthxbye-code I'd like to take this
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2023):

Thanks @abhi1693!

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 12, 2023): Thanks @abhi1693!
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:20:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2023):

We discovered during review of PR #11481 that resolving this adequately will likely require a significant amount of further work. Given the upcoming release of NetBox v3.5, which replaces the current schema with OpenAPI 3.0 (see #9608), we're going to abandon this change.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 10, 2023): We discovered during review of PR #11481 that resolving this adequately will likely require a significant amount of further work. Given the upcoming release of NetBox v3.5, which replaces the current schema with OpenAPI 3.0 (see #9608), we're going to abandon this change.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7229
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?