starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

tenants (in circuits list) sorted incorrectly #5308

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @opericgithub on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021).

NetBox version

v3.0b

Python version

3.7

Steps to Reproduce

open circuits list.
sort it by tenants.

Expected Behavior

tenants (in circuits list) should be sorted alphabeticaly.

Observed Behavior

tenants (in circuits list) should be sorted alphabeticaly. instead, they are sorted first by tenant group, then alphabeticaly.
for example, I have tenant group "1" with tenants X, Y, Z, and tenant group "2" with tenants A, B and C.
in circuits list they are sorted as X, Y, Z, A, B, C, instead of A, B, C, X, Y, Z.

Originally created by @opericgithub on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021). ### NetBox version v3.0b ### Python version 3.7 ### Steps to Reproduce open circuits list. sort it by tenants. ### Expected Behavior tenants (in circuits list) should be sorted alphabeticaly. ### Observed Behavior tenants (in circuits list) should be sorted alphabeticaly. instead, they are sorted first by tenant group, then alphabeticaly. for example, I have tenant group "1" with tenants X, Y, Z, and tenant group "2" with tenants A, B and C. in circuits list they are sorted as X, Y, Z, A, B, C, instead of A, B, C, X, Y, Z.
adam added the status: duplicate label 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021):

This is consistent with the rest of the GUI. Marking this as a feature, not a bug and it will be under review until we get more feedback.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021): This is consistent with the rest of the GUI. Marking this as a feature, not a bug and it will be under review until we get more feedback.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:30 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021):

This was already raised in #6988.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 3, 2021): This was already raised in #6988.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: duplicate
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5308
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?