starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Represent Servers which are attached to External Storage #5271

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:26:06 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:06 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @salman-uk on GitHub (Aug 31, 2021).

NetBox version

v3.0.0

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

Hi,

It doesn't appear that there is a currently a way to show the servers which are attached to external storage.

What I would like to propose is a way to show this, in particular on the rack layout page. Essentially, what this needs is a line from a server to another device on the rack diagram page.

Can you advise if this might be possible or another way we can represent this information on netbox.

Many thanks,

Use case

This would allow the users to visualize via the rack layout page all those servers which are attached to external storage.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @salman-uk on GitHub (Aug 31, 2021). ### NetBox version v3.0.0 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality Hi, It doesn't appear that there is a currently a way to show the servers which are attached to external storage. What I would like to propose is a way to show this, in particular on the rack layout page. Essentially, what this needs is a line from a server to another device on the rack diagram page. Can you advise if this might be possible or another way we can represent this information on netbox. Many thanks, ### Use case This would allow the users to visualize via the rack layout page all those servers which are attached to external storage. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 19:26:06 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:26:06 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:26:06 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 1, 2021):

The rack elevation view is exactly that: a visual representation of the arrangement of devices within a rack. It intentionally does not show any connections, so I'm afraid this feature request must be declined.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Oct 1, 2021): The rack elevation view is exactly that: a visual representation of the arrangement of devices within a rack. It intentionally does not show _any_ connections, so I'm afraid this feature request must be declined.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5271
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?