Originally created by @heffergm on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021).
As relates to https://letsencrypt.org/2020/12/21/extending-android-compatibility.html, it sounds like there is presently no way to select the alternate chain LE is going to offer (Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1). Is this something that's in the works?
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021):
This is already supported in the newest version.
Either as CLI argument:
` --preferred-chain issuer-cn Use alternative certificate chain identified by issuer CN`
Or via a config parameter:
```
# Preferred issuer chain (default: <unset> -> uses default chain)
#PREFERRED_CHAIN=
```
So, the question arose due to this note from LetsEncrypt:
What about the alternate chain? Today, some ACME clients are able to instead request an alternate chain, if their user has
configured it. We currently provide the option of getting the chain: Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1 We will
continue to offer this same chain as an alternate. However, note that most ACME clients don’t yet have a way to select this
alternate chain (for example, Certbot selects chains by looking to see if they contain a given Issuer Name, but this chain
doesn’t contain any Issuer Names which the high compatibility chain above doesn’t). We’ll be working with ACME client
developers to create more flexible chain selection mechanisms going forward.
Specifically, the note about "no acme clients having a way to select this alternate chain...". If the existing preferred-chain option in dehydrated doesn't suffer this issue, that's great.
@heffergm commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2021):
So, the question arose due to this note from LetsEncrypt:
```
What about the alternate chain? Today, some ACME clients are able to instead request an alternate chain, if their user has
configured it. We currently provide the option of getting the chain: Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1 We will
continue to offer this same chain as an alternate. However, note that most ACME clients don’t yet have a way to select this
alternate chain (for example, Certbot selects chains by looking to see if they contain a given Issuer Name, but this chain
doesn’t contain any Issuer Names which the high compatibility chain above doesn’t). We’ll be working with ACME client
developers to create more flexible chain selection mechanisms going forward.
```
Specifically, the note about "no acme clients having a way to select this alternate chain...". If the existing preferred-chain option in dehydrated doesn't suffer this issue, that's great.
My current implementation just travels up the trust chain until it gets to the uppermost issuer certificate, which in this case should be DST Root CA X3 by default, or ISRG Root X1 as alternative, and those names should be selectable by the mentioned parameters.
[...] available options: DST Root CA X3, ISRG Root X1
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2021):
My current implementation just travels up the trust chain until it gets to the uppermost issuer certificate, which in this case should be `DST Root CA X3` by default, or `ISRG Root X1` as alternative, and those names should be selectable by the mentioned parameters.
`[...] available options: DST Root CA X3, ISRG Root X1`
Specifically, the note about "no acme clients having a way to select this alternate chain...". If the existing preferred-chain option in dehydrated doesn't suffer this issue, that's great.
it seems that is the case, cos i checked my cert at the browsers and still shows R3 as issuer.. check #892 or i dont know how is the workflow of those mechanish?
configured it. We currently provide the option of getting the chain: Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1 We will continue to offer this same chain as an alternate. However, note that most ACME clients don’t yet have a way to select this alternate chain (for example, Certbot selects chains by looking to see if they contain a given Issuer Name, but this chain doesn’t contain any Issuer Names which the high compatibility chain above doesn’t). We’ll be working with ACME client developers to create more flexible chain selection mechanisms going forward.
@mckaygerhard commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2022):
> Specifically, the note about "no acme clients having a way to select this alternate chain...". If the existing preferred-chain option in dehydrated doesn't suffer this issue, that's great.
it seems that is the case, cos i checked my cert at the browsers and still shows R3 as issuer.. check #892 or i dont know how is the workflow of those mechanish?
> configured it. We currently provide the option of getting the chain: Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1 We will continue to offer this same chain as an alternate. However, note that most ACME clients don’t yet have a way to select this alternate chain (for example, Certbot selects chains by looking to see if they contain a given Issuer Name, but this chain doesn’t contain any Issuer Names which the high compatibility chain above doesn’t). We’ll be working with ACME client developers to create more flexible chain selection mechanisms going forward.
>
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Originally created by @heffergm on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021).
As relates to https://letsencrypt.org/2020/12/21/extending-android-compatibility.html, it sounds like there is presently no way to select the alternate chain LE is going to offer (Subscriber Certificate < – R3 < – ISRG Root X1). Is this something that's in the works?
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2021):
This is already supported in the newest version.
Either as CLI argument:
--preferred-chain issuer-cn Use alternative certificate chain identified by issuer CNOr via a config parameter:
@heffergm commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2021):
So, the question arose due to this note from LetsEncrypt:
Specifically, the note about "no acme clients having a way to select this alternate chain...". If the existing preferred-chain option in dehydrated doesn't suffer this issue, that's great.
@lukas2511 commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2021):
My current implementation just travels up the trust chain until it gets to the uppermost issuer certificate, which in this case should be
DST Root CA X3by default, orISRG Root X1as alternative, and those names should be selectable by the mentioned parameters.[...] available options: DST Root CA X3, ISRG Root X1@mckaygerhard commented on GitHub (Nov 17, 2022):
it seems that is the case, cos i checked my cert at the browsers and still shows R3 as issuer.. check #892 or i dont know how is the workflow of those mechanish?