Do not revalidate authorizations on forced renewal

This commit introduces a new cli argument `--force-validation` which,
when used in combination with `--force` ignores valid domain
authorizations and forces a revalidation.

This has been implemented since at least LE seems to have changed some
behavior on valid authorizations. Only the previously validated
authorization-type is reusable, causing dehydrated to error out when
changing from recently validated authorization types while still trying
to force-renew certificates for whatever reason (e.g. changing algorithms).

CHANGELOG

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
 This file contains a log of major changes in dehydrated
 
 ## [x.x.x] - xxxx-xx-xx
-No major changes yet.
+## Changed
+- `--force` no longer forces domain name revalidation by default, a new argument `--force-validation` has been added for that
 
 ## [0.7.0] - 2020-12-10
 ## Added

README.md

@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ Parameters:
  --alias certalias                Use specified name for certificate directory (and per-certificate config) instead of the primary domain (only used if --domain is specified)
  --keep-going (-g)                Keep going after encountering an error while creating/renewing multiple certificates in cron mode
  --force (-x)                     Force renew of certificate even if it is longer valid than value in RENEW_DAYS
+ --force-validation               Force revalidation of domain names (used in combination with --force)
  --no-lock (-n)                   Don't use lockfile (potentially dangerous!)
  --lock-suffix example.com        Suffix lockfile name with a string (useful for with -d)
  --ocsp                           Sets option in CSR indicating OCSP stapling to be mandatory

dehydrated

@@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ load_config() {
   [[ -n "${PARAM_OCSP_MUST_STAPLE:-}" ]] && OCSP_MUST_STAPLE="${PARAM_OCSP_MUST_STAPLE}"
   [[ -n "${PARAM_IP_VERSION:-}" ]] && IP_VERSION="${PARAM_IP_VERSION}"
 
+  if [ "${PARAM_FORCE_VALIDATION:-no}" = "yes" ] && [ "${PARAM_FORCE:-no}" = "no" ]; then
+    _exiterr "Argument --force-validation can only be used in combination with --force (-x)"
+  fi
+
   if [ ! "${1:-}" = "noverify" ]; then
     verify_config
   fi
@@ -1010,9 +1014,13 @@ sign_csr() {
     fi
 
     # Check if authorization has already been validated
-    if [ "$(echo "${response}" | _sed 's/"challenges": \[\{.*\}\]//' | get_json_string_value status)" = "valid" ] && [ ! "${PARAM_FORCE:-no}" = "yes" ]; then
-      echo " + Found valid authorization for ${identifier}"
-      continue
+    if [ "$(echo "${response}" | get_json_string_value status)" = "valid" ]; then
+      if [ "${PARAM_FORCE_VALIDATION:-no}" = "yes" ]; then
+        echo " + A valid authorization has been found but will be ignored"
+      else
+        echo " + Found valid authorization for ${identifier}"
+        continue
+      fi
     fi
 
     # Find challenge in authorization
@@ -2107,6 +2115,12 @@ main() {
         PARAM_FORCE="yes"
         ;;
 
+      # PARAM_Usage: --force-validation
+      # PARAM_Description: Force revalidation of domain names (used in combination with --force)
+      --force-validation)
+        PARAM_FORCE_VALIDATION="yes"
+        ;;
+
       # PARAM_Usage: --no-lock (-n)
       # PARAM_Description: Don't use lockfile (potentially dangerous!)
       --no-lock|-n)