Three commands, all host-independent so the browser build answers them from the same model layer as the desktop: - models_snapshot_request, for the edit-session boundaries only the frontend can see. It takes a reason and nothing else — the caller does not decide whether anything changed, because content addressing already has. - models_request_version, which returns a version and the live request's content together so they are guaranteed comparable, plus the same content-hash verdict the backend uses rather than a second opinion formed in TypeScript. - models_restore_request_version. The browser host also snapshots before its own send, since its send pipeline is in TypeScript rather than in the shared crate. Bindings regenerated with CI's `cargo test --all --features yaak-app-client/wry`, which also drops a stale ImportSourceResource from the rpc-schema copy and adds a missing ImportSource to the plugins copy.
yaak-rpc-schema
The wire schema for the app's RPC surface: every command name, its request payload, and its response type, declared once.
Every host that serves the Yaak UI — the desktop app today, the browser bridge
and anything after it — imports these types and implements the commands against
them. That is what keeps a request's shape from drifting between hosts, and it
is why the TypeScript bindings (bindings/gen_rpc.ts, exposed to the frontend
as @yaakapp-internal/rpc-schema) are generated from one place.
Nothing here depends on Tauri or on any host. Request structs are plain data, and so are the few response types declared here rather than in an engine crate. Command bodies live with the host that runs them.
Adding a command
- Add its request struct and an entry in
with_commands!insrc/lib.rs. - Write the adapter in each host — the desktop's live in
crates-tauri/yaak-app-client/src/rpc_ext.rs. A host that does not support the command still has to say so; a missing adapter fails to compile. - Regenerate the bindings:
cargo test -p yaak-rpc-schemawritesbindings/gen_rpc.ts, which is committed.
How hosts consume the list
with_commands! takes the name of a macro_rules! macro and calls it with the
full name(Req) -> Res list. Each host writes a small macro that receives that
list and builds its router:
macro_rules! register_commands {
( $( $name:ident ( $req:ty ) -> $res:ty ),* $(,)? ) => {
pub fn build_router() -> RpcRouter<MyCtx> {
let mut router = RpcRouter::new();
$( router.register(stringify!($name), rpc_handler_async!($name)); )*
router
}
};
}
yaak_rpc_schema::with_commands!(register_commands);
The schema decides what commands exist; the host decides how each one runs.