mirror of
https://github.com/ryan4yin/nix-config.git
synced 2026-04-26 01:48:27 +02:00
chore(All Markdown Files): auto wrap text, fix typos
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,11 +1,14 @@
|
||||
# Helix Editor
|
||||
|
||||
Neovim is really powerful, and have a very active community. I use it as my main editor, and I'm very happy with it. I use it for everything, from writing code to writing this document.
|
||||
Neovim is really powerful, and have a very active community. I use it as my main editor, and I'm
|
||||
very happy with it. I use it for everything, from writing code to writing this document.
|
||||
|
||||
But its configuration is a bit complex, and finding the right plugins, writing configurations, and keeping everything up to date is not easy.
|
||||
But its configuration is a bit complex, and finding the right plugins, writing configurations, and
|
||||
keeping everything up to date is not easy.
|
||||
|
||||
That's why I'm interested in Helix, Helix is similar to Neovim, but it's more opinionated, and it's batteries included.
|
||||
Whether I'll switch my main editor to Helix or not, it gives me a lot of ideas on how to improve my Neovim workflow.
|
||||
That's why I'm interested in Helix, Helix is similar to Neovim, but it's more opinionated, and it's
|
||||
batteries included. Whether I'll switch my main editor to Helix or not, it gives me a lot of ideas
|
||||
on how to improve my Neovim workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tutorial
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,30 +17,48 @@ Use `:tutor` in helix to start the tutorial.
|
||||
## Differences between Neovim and Helixer
|
||||
|
||||
1. Selecting first, then action.
|
||||
1. Helix: delete 2 word: `2w` then `x`. You can always see what you're selecting before you apply the action.
|
||||
2. Neovim: delete 2 word: `d`. then `2w`. No visual feedback before you apply the action.
|
||||
1. Helix - Morden builtin features: LSP, tree-sitter, fuzzy finder, multi cursors, surround and more.
|
||||
1. They're all available in Neovim too, but you need to find and use the right plugins manually, which takes time and effort.
|
||||
1. Helix is built in Rust from scratch. The result is a much smaller codebase and a modern set of defaults. No VimScript. No Lua.
|
||||
1. Neovim contains a lot of VimScript, and lua is too dynamic, it's hard to debug.
|
||||
1. Personally I'm glad to take a look at a Rust codebase, but not a VimScript/Lua codebase.
|
||||
1. Neovim have a very activate plugin ecosystem, and it's easy to find plugins for almost everything.
|
||||
1. Helix is still new, and it even do have a stable plugin system yet. A PR to add a plugin system is still envolving: <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/8675>
|
||||
2. Neovim has intergrated terminal, and it's very powerful. It's quite similar to VSCode's intergrated terminal. I use it a lot.
|
||||
1. Helix doesn't have a intergrated terminal yet, as it's complicated to implement. Users are recommended to use tmux/Zellij or Wezterm/Kitty to implement this feature instead.
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1976#issuecomment-1091074719>
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/4649>
|
||||
1. **My Neovim often gets stuck when I switch to [toggleterm.nvim](https://github.com/akinsho/toggleterm.nvim), this Helix issue made me consider to switch from this Neovim plugin to Zellij**.
|
||||
1. Helix do not have a tree-view panel, it's recommended to use Yazi/ranger/Broot instead, and open Helix in them.
|
||||
1. a tree-view plugin may be added after the plugin system is stable, but no one knows when it will be.
|
||||
2. and some Helix users stated that they don't need a tree-view plugin, Helix's file picker is useful and good enough.
|
||||
1. It seems Helix lacks a global substitution command, you should run it in another window(via wm or Zellij).
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/196>
|
||||
1. Neovim's substitution command allow you to preview the changes before you apply it, and it's very useful. if I switch to Helix, I'll need to find some other tools with similar feature(such as https://github.com/ms-jpq/sad).
|
||||
1. Complexity and Maintenance Costs vs Batteries Included: <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/6356>
|
||||
1. Helix: delete 2 word: `2w` then `x`. You can always see what you're selecting before you apply
|
||||
the action.
|
||||
2. Neovim: delete 2 word: `d`. then `2w`. No visual feedback before you apply the action.
|
||||
1. Helix - Morden builtin features: LSP, tree-sitter, fuzzy finder, multi cursors, surround and
|
||||
more.
|
||||
1. They're all available in Neovim too, but you need to find and use the right plugins manually,
|
||||
which takes time and effort.
|
||||
1. Helix is built in Rust from scratch. The result is a much smaller codebase and a modern set of
|
||||
defaults. No VimScript. No Lua.
|
||||
1. Neovim contains a lot of VimScript, and lua is too dynamic, it's hard to debug.
|
||||
1. Personally I'm glad to take a look at a Rust codebase, but not a VimScript/Lua codebase.
|
||||
1. Neovim have a very activate plugin ecosystem, and it's easy to find plugins for almost
|
||||
everything.
|
||||
1. Helix is still new, and it even do have a stable plugin system yet. A PR to add a plugin
|
||||
system is still envolving: <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/8675>
|
||||
1. Neovim has integrated terminal, and it's very powerful. It's quite similar to VSCode's integrated
|
||||
terminal. I use it a lot.
|
||||
1. Helix doesn't have a integrated terminal yet, as it's complicated to implement. Users are
|
||||
recommended to use tmux/Zellij or Wezterm/Kitty to implement this feature instead.
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/1976#issuecomment-1091074719>
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/pull/4649>
|
||||
1. **My Neovim often gets stuck when I switch to
|
||||
[toggleterm.nvim](https://github.com/akinsho/toggleterm.nvim), this Helix issue made me
|
||||
consider to switch from this Neovim plugin to Zellij**.
|
||||
1. Helix do not have a tree-view panel, it's recommended to use Yazi/ranger/Broot instead, and open
|
||||
Helix in them.
|
||||
1. a tree-view plugin may be added after the plugin system is stable, but no one knows when it
|
||||
will be.
|
||||
2. and some Helix users stated that they don't need a tree-view plugin, Helix's file picker is
|
||||
useful and good enough.
|
||||
1. It seems Helix lacks a global substitution command, you should run it in another window(via wm or
|
||||
Zellij).
|
||||
1. <https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/issues/196>
|
||||
1. Neovim's substitution command allow you to preview the changes before you apply it, and it's
|
||||
very useful. if I switch to Helix, I'll need to find some other tools with similar
|
||||
feature(such as https://github.com/ms-jpq/sad).
|
||||
1. Complexity and Maintenance Costs vs Batteries Included:
|
||||
<https://github.com/helix-editor/helix/discussions/6356>
|
||||
|
||||
I think Use Helix/Neovim within a terminal file manager(Yazi/ranger/Broot) and Zellij is a good
|
||||
idea. It's quite different from the workflow I migrated from VSCode/JetBrains before, I'm very
|
||||
interested in it.
|
||||
|
||||
I think Use Helix/Neovim within a terminal file manager(Yazi/ranger/Broot) and Zellij is a good idea.
|
||||
It's quite different from the workflow I migrated from VSCode/JetBrains before, I'm very interested in it.
|
||||
|
||||
In Neovim I can make the workflow similar to VSCode/JetBrains by using some plugins, but Helix forces me to get out of my comfort zone, and try something new.
|
||||
In Neovim I can make the workflow similar to VSCode/JetBrains by using some plugins, but Helix
|
||||
forces me to get out of my comfort zone, and try something new.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user