starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Specify Which User Groups Can View And Use Specific Saved Filters #9705

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:21:20 +01:00 by adam · 7 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:20 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @mr1716 on GitHub (May 20, 2024).

NetBox version

v3.7.8

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

This would allow admins to specify which Groups can use specific Saved Filters. Currently, if I have 10 Saved Filters, I believe that if all users can view that object, they will all be able to view all 10 Saved Filters, even if they're not needed or applicable.

Use case

The use case is that I have 2 teams using Netbox, and I have 10 filters. 4 specific to team A, 3 to team B, and 3 shared. Therefore, I would want team A to view 7 Saved Filters (1-4 and 7-10) and team B view 6 filters (5-10). Showing a more limited number of Saved Filters based on Group Permissions would provide an improved, faster, and decluttered Saved Filter experience.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @mr1716 on GitHub (May 20, 2024). ### NetBox version v3.7.8 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality This would allow admins to specify which Groups can use specific Saved Filters. Currently, if I have 10 Saved Filters, I believe that if all users can view that object, they will all be able to view all 10 Saved Filters, even if they're not needed or applicable. ### Use case The use case is that I have 2 teams using Netbox, and I have 10 filters. 4 specific to team A, 3 to team B, and 3 shared. Therefore, I would want team A to view 7 Saved Filters (1-4 and 7-10) and team B view 6 filters (5-10). Showing a more limited number of Saved Filters based on Group Permissions would provide an improved, faster, and decluttered Saved Filter experience. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurepending closurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 21:21:20 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:21:20 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:21 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024):

Edited the title to be clear. Didn’t realize that the title didn’t reflect the body of the request so updated it!! I know this would be a change, but think it would be helpful!

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024): Edited the title to be clear. Didn’t realize that the title didn’t reflect the body of the request so updated it!! I know this would be a change, but think it would be helpful!
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:22 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024):

If I've understood your proposal correctly, it should be possible to accomplish your use case using a Permission to grant different Groups access to view different sets of Saved Filters.

If I've misunderstood, please update your issue body to clarify the distinction between your proposal and what I've just described.

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024): If I've understood your proposal correctly, it should be possible to accomplish your use case using a Permission to grant different Groups access to view different sets of Saved Filters. If I've misunderstood, please update your issue body to clarify the distinction between your proposal and what I've just described.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:22 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024):

@jeffgdotorg you are correct

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 22, 2024): @jeffgdotorg you are correct
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:23 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 23, 2024):

@jeffgdotorg my question and I think use case is: if 2 user groups have access to the same object that the Saved Filters are applied against, is there a way to limit which groups can view those Saved Filters?

for example, I want to limit the Group Users to only see the Saved Filter for Active DCIM Device Objects, but not Needs Refresh Saved Filter for DCIM Device Objects. But I want the Group Power Users to be able to view both Saved a filters.

If this is already possible, please let me know. Didn’t see an easy way to do that and I may be missing something

@mr1716 commented on GitHub (May 23, 2024): @jeffgdotorg my question and I think use case is: if 2 user groups have access to the same object that the Saved Filters are applied against, is there a way to limit which groups can view those Saved Filters? for example, I want to limit the Group Users to only see the Saved Filter for Active DCIM Device Objects, but not Needs Refresh Saved Filter for DCIM Device Objects. But I want the Group Power Users to be able to view both Saved a filters. If this is already possible, please let me know. Didn’t see an easy way to do that and I may be missing something
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:23 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 31, 2024):

This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (May 31, 2024): This is a reminder that additional information is needed in order to further triage this issue. If the requested details are not provided, the issue will soon be closed automatically.
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:23 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024):

Maybe it's just because it's late in my workday, but I've gone a bit crosseyed parsing your comment of May 23. Would you please edit it for clarity, or follow it up with another clarifying comment?

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (Jul 3, 2024): Maybe it's just because it's late in my workday, but I've gone a bit crosseyed parsing your comment of May 23. Would you please edit it for clarity, or follow it up with another clarifying comment?
adam commented 2025-12-29 21:21:23 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024):

This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 26, 2024): This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure status: revisions needed type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9705
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?