Assign VLAN to device #9598

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 21:19:31 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @PieterL75 on GitHub (May 7, 2024).

NetBox version

v4.0.0

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Currently VLAN can be linked to interfaces (tagged and untagged).
My proposal is the ability to link VLANs to devices.

Use case

Not all vlans that are on an interface are actual vlans on the device. If you have a routed port with subinterfaces, then the vlan on the subinterface is never in the layer2 of the device.

Being able to link the vlans to a devices, tells me what VLANs I have to configure in the vlan database.

Another option would be a 'flag' or interfacetype that would tell that the vlan is not part of the layer2domain of the switch

The goals is the ability to generate VLAN configurations from the dcim, without over-creating vlans (like from the routed subinterface)

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @PieterL75 on GitHub (May 7, 2024). ### NetBox version v4.0.0 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Currently VLAN can be linked to interfaces (tagged and untagged). My proposal is the ability to link VLANs to devices. ### Use case Not all vlans that are on an interface are actual vlans on the device. If you have a routed port with subinterfaces, then the vlan on the subinterface is never in the layer2 of the device. Being able to link the vlans to a devices, tells me what VLANs I have to configure in the vlan database. Another option would be a 'flag' or interfacetype that would tell that the vlan is not part of the layer2domain of the switch The goals is the ability to generate VLAN configurations from the dcim, without over-creating vlans (like from the routed subinterface) ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurestatus: duplicate labels 2025-12-29 21:19:31 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 21:19:31 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024):

I believe this would be covered by #14451.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 21, 2024): I believe this would be covered by #14451.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9598