starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Enable linking circuits based on a common circuit service group #94

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 15:32:40 +01:00 by adam · 7 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:40 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ryanmerolle on GitHub (Jun 30, 2016).

Circuits seems to be specifically focused on a single end, but there is no way to link circuits tied to a single "service group." A service group would be 1 or many circuits.

Originally created by @ryanmerolle on GitHub (Jun 30, 2016). Circuits seems to be specifically focused on a single end, but there is no way to link circuits tied to a single "service group." A service group would be 1 or many circuits.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 15:32:40 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@rkwl1 commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2016):

Circuits should be able to link the A and Z location. Also a field for cross connect provider, as those can change from datacenter to datacenter.

@rkwl1 commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2016): Circuits should be able to link the A and Z location. Also a field for cross connect provider, as those can change from datacenter to datacenter.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:43 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016):

Yep as the feature states this would be achieved given some sort of service group. Service groups allow for not just A to Z, but A through Z and some.

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Jul 13, 2016): Yep as the feature states this would be achieved given some sort of service group. Service groups allow for not just A to Z, but A through Z and some.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:43 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bsakdol commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2016):

Just my two cents, since I was looking for this exact feature... The A to Z link of a circuit is what I was originally looking for, but I could certainly see how a service group would be more generally beneficial, since multi-point connections could be grouped together in this way. Either way, it would be great to see this feature added.

@bsakdol commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2016): Just my two cents, since I was looking for this exact feature... The A to Z link of a circuit is what I was originally looking for, but I could certainly see how a service group would be more generally beneficial, since multi-point connections could be grouped together in this way. Either way, it would be great to see this feature added.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:44 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@alexjhart commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2016):

I was looking to solve connecting two ends of a circuit today and found this service group issue would likely solve that. I wonder if this is more of a short term feature request or more of a long term roadmap type item? I see it has been open for several months, yet has the minor feature tag.

@alexjhart commented on GitHub (Dec 20, 2016): I was looking to solve connecting two ends of a circuit today and found this service group issue would likely solve that. I wonder if this is more of a short term feature request or more of a long term roadmap type item? I see it has been open for several months, yet has the minor feature tag.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):

#49 has been completed to allow for both the A and Z sides of a circuit to be defined (this will be available in v1.8.0). I'm going to close this issue out as it seems to overlap heavily with this feature. Adding a mechanism for grouping circuits seems like it would be redundant to the existing combination of provider and type.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016): #49 has been completed to allow for both the A and Z sides of a circuit to be defined (this will be available in v1.8.0). I'm going to close this issue out as it seems to overlap heavily with this feature. Adding a mechanism for grouping circuits seems like it would be redundant to the existing combination of provider and type.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):

So how does this take care of carrier provided MPLS and VPLS circuits where there are multiple sides to a service?

@ryanmerolle commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016): So how does this take care of carrier provided MPLS and VPLS circuits where there are multiple sides to a service?
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:32:45 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016):

Each circuit has only two endpoints, regardless of the type of service it carries.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 21, 2016): Each circuit has only two endpoints, regardless of the type of service it carries.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#94
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?