starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Limit screen width for object detail views but use full screen for list views #9317

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:48:20 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:48:20 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Mar 4, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.7.3

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

The v3 UI currently renders all views using the full screen width. On very wide viewports, this can result in unnatural layout using too much horizontal whitespace for object detail views. Conversely, the new v4.0 UI in development limits all views to a maximum width; this should be extended for list views which typically benefit from the additional horizontal space.

Use case

Utilizing different maximum content widths depending on the context provides better UX.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Mar 4, 2024). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.7.3 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality The v3 UI currently renders all views using the full screen width. On very wide viewports, this can result in unnatural layout using too much horizontal whitespace for object detail views. Conversely, the new v4.0 UI in development limits all views to a maximum width; this should be extended for list views which typically benefit from the additional horizontal space. ### Use case Utilizing different maximum content widths depending on the context provides better UX. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 20:48:20 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:48:21 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:48:21 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2024):

I ended up just using full width containers for all views for consistency.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 20, 2024): I ended up just using full width containers for all views for consistency.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9317
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?