starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 22:03:32 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

IPAM Site Prefixes render children indent when the parent is not assigned. #9242

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:47:24 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:47:24 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jchambers2012 on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

3.7.2 and 3.6.5

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

Hide Depth Indicators work as expected but with the indicator on can cause some confusion.

  1. Navigate to IPAM -> Prefixes
  2. Add new prefix with the following settings.
    PREFEX: 10.112.157.0/24
    DESCRIPTION: BROKEN PARENTS
    Site: DM-Akron
  3. Create
  4. Navigate to Organization -> Site -> DM-Akron -> Click Prefixes
  5. 10.112.157.0/24 looks like it a child of 10.112.128.0/22
    image

This can be more "confusing" when adding more 45.x.x.x/x networks:
For example add the following Prefixes:

  • 45.0.0.0/8
  • 45.25.0.0/16
  • 45.25.25.0/24
  • 45.25.25.0/29 - Assign to Site: DM-Akron

Global Prefixes View:
Navigate to IPAM -> Prefixes
image

Site Prefixes View:
Navigate to Organization -> Site -> DM-Akron -> Click Prefixes
image

Expected Behavior

Since the parent is not "linked" to this Site the three dots should not be rendered or some other GUI object should be rendered pointing to it true parent?

One thought when in this filter view:

  • 10.112.128.0/22 should have 0 dots
    • 10.112.128.0/22 children should have 1 dot
  • 10.112.157.0/24 should have 0 dots

Observed Behavior

All prefix are indented based on where they live on the global prefix list:
image

Originally created by @jchambers2012 on GitHub (Feb 13, 2024). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version 3.7.2 and 3.6.5 ### Python Version 3.11 ### Steps to Reproduce `Hide Depth Indicators` work as expected but with the indicator on can cause some confusion. 1. Navigate to IPAM -> Prefixes 2. Add new prefix with the following settings. PREFEX: 10.112.157.0/24 DESCRIPTION: BROKEN PARENTS Site: DM-Akron 3. Create 4. Navigate to Organization -> Site -> DM-Akron -> Click Prefixes 5. 10.112.157.0/24 looks like it a child of 10.112.128.0/22 ![image](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/6090690/3100c4f9-83e0-4dd9-a797-fde7f4ced374) This can be more "confusing" when adding more 45.x.x.x/x networks: For example add the following Prefixes: - 45.0.0.0/8 - 45.25.0.0/16 - 45.25.25.0/24 - 45.25.25.0/29 - Assign to Site: DM-Akron Global Prefixes View: Navigate to IPAM -> Prefixes ![image](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/6090690/784c0226-9339-4321-9732-45cc577b77c3) Site Prefixes View: Navigate to Organization -> Site -> DM-Akron -> Click Prefixes ![image](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/6090690/c6118a68-f59a-4152-a106-144094b28e83) ### Expected Behavior Since the parent is not "linked" to this Site the three dots should not be rendered or some other GUI object should be rendered pointing to it true parent? One thought when in this filter view: - 10.112.128.0/22 should have 0 dots - 10.112.128.0/22 children should have 1 dot - 10.112.157.0/24 should have 0 dots ### Observed Behavior All prefix are indented based on where they live on the global prefix list: ![image](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/6090690/f7c54728-4b54-47f2-b1f0-6952a9b649f4)
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:47:25 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:47:25 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2024):

Goto https://demo.netbox.dev/ipam/prefixes/

Please revise your report above to remove all references to the demo instance.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2024): > Goto https://demo.netbox.dev/ipam/prefixes/ Please revise your report above to remove all references to the demo instance.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:47:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jchambers2012 commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2024):

@jeremystretch - removed - let me know if that will work as having existing data from the demo site was used in the screenshot examples above.

@jchambers2012 commented on GitHub (Feb 14, 2024): @jeremystretch - removed - let me know if that will work as having existing data from the demo site was used in the screenshot examples above.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:47:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2024):

This is working as expected; the indentation annotates each prefix's depth in the hierarchy. If you'd prefer not to see this, you can replace the default "prefix" column in the table configuration with "prefix (flat)", which does not annotate depth.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 15, 2024): This is working as expected; the indentation annotates each prefix's depth in the hierarchy. If you'd prefer not to see this, you can replace the default "prefix" column in the table configuration with "prefix (flat)", which does not annotate depth.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9242
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?