starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 13:53:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add tenancy groups to bulk import #9174

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:46:32 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:32 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @thiagomarafeli on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024).

NetBox version

v3.7.1

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

When you try to bulk import Locations (e.g.) with a tenancy that is not unique, it prompts you an error saying that. But, it is allowed to create multiple Tenancies with the same name (and slug), but it has to be in different groups.
So, it would be nice if I can specify the Tenancy group also, because, without that, I can't import it.

Use case

I have a tenancy group with name and slug "X" and "Y"
I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in group "X"
I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in group "Y"
I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in no group

I want to import it, a Location that it is in tenancy "A", which is in group "Y", without any problems
Nowadays, there's no "tenancy group" field option in import and, if you use "A" in Tenancy field, it raises:
Record 1 tenant: "A" is not unique value for this field; multiple objects were found

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @thiagomarafeli on GitHub (Jan 30, 2024). ### NetBox version v3.7.1 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality When you try to bulk import Locations (e.g.) with a tenancy that is not unique, it prompts you an error saying that. But, it is allowed to create multiple Tenancies with the same name (and slug), but it has to be in different groups. So, it would be nice if I can specify the Tenancy group also, because, without that, I can't import it. ### Use case I have a tenancy group with name and slug "X" and "Y" I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in group "X" I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in group "Y" I have a tenancy with name and slug "A" in no group I want to import it, a Location that it is in tenancy "A", which is in group "Y", without any problems Nowadays, there's no "tenancy group" field option in import and, if you use "A" in Tenancy field, it raises: `Record 1 tenant: "A" is not unique value for this field; multiple objects were found` ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:46:32 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2024):

If implemented, this should be done consistently for all models which support tenant assignment, ideally via the use of a mixin class which adds the tenant and tenant_group fields to each bulk import form.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2024): If implemented, this should be done consistently for all models which support tenant assignment, ideally via the use of a mixin class which adds the `tenant` and `tenant_group` fields to each bulk import form.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Do not attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 21, 2024): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. **Do not** attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:33 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Sep 19, 2024):

This is a bit more work to implement as tenant_group is not actually on any of the models, only tenant is, so this requires accessing the group through the tenant, tenant__group or such and that isn't currently supported anywhere in our CSV code.

@arthanson commented on GitHub (Sep 19, 2024): This is a bit more work to implement as tenant_group is not actually on any of the models, only tenant is, so this requires accessing the group through the tenant, tenant__group or such and that isn't currently supported anywhere in our CSV code.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:34 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2024):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 20, 2024): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label complexity: medium netbox pending closure status: needs owner type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9174
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?