starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Option to not verify SSL Certificate for RSS Feed #9126

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:45:59 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:45:59 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @YoucefYousfi on GitHub (Jan 22, 2024).

NetBox version

v3.7.1

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

For the RSS Feed, adding the option of not verifying the SSL Certificate.
In UI : a checkbox to add "verify=False" option to the rss feed request
In default dashboard configuration : a simple verify=False line added

Use case

This would allow users to use unverified URLs for RSS Feeds optionally.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @YoucefYousfi on GitHub (Jan 22, 2024). ### NetBox version v3.7.1 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality For the RSS Feed, adding the option of not verifying the SSL Certificate. In UI : a checkbox to add "verify=False" option to the rss feed request In default dashboard configuration : a simple verify=False line added ### Use case This would allow users to use unverified URLs for RSS Feeds optionally. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 20:45:59 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:46:00 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024):

This would allow users to use unverified URLs for RSS Feeds optionally.

I think an additional use case might be to allow a MitM for things like corporate firewalls without having to load and maintain the certificate (although you should IMO)

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024): > This would allow users to use unverified URLs for RSS Feeds optionally. I think an additional use case might be to allow a MitM for things like corporate firewalls without having to load and maintain the certificate (although you should IMO)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:00 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024):

IMO, as an industry we are by now beyond this. Management of TLS certificates has become so easy and commonplace, there's really no excuse for having an invalid certificate. (I'm aware we have an option on the webhook model to disable certificate validation; I think we should get rid of it.)

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2024): IMO, as an industry we are by now beyond this. Management of TLS certificates has become so easy and commonplace, there's really no excuse for having an invalid certificate. (I'm aware we have an option on the webhook model to disable certificate validation; I think we should get rid of it.)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:46:01 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2024):

I'm going to close this out as the proposal pretty starkly violates good security practice.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 8, 2024): I'm going to close this out as the proposal pretty starkly violates good security practice.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9126
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?