starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 22:03:32 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

VPN IKE Proposal Multiselect Option #9085

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:45:16 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:45:16 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @markh0338 on GitHub (Jan 13, 2024).

NetBox version

v3.7.0

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

In some configurations, it is possible to have multiple encryption/authentication/group algorithms selected in a single proposal. Currently, in v3.7.0 only one encryption algorithm or authentication algorithm or DH group can be selected per proposal. It would be nice to be able to select multiple options for each field.

Use case

A proposal like this is currently not possible to documented.
crypto ikev2 proposal ike-proposal-1
encryption aes-cbc-256 aes-cbc-128
integrity sha512 sha256
group 21 20 19

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @markh0338 on GitHub (Jan 13, 2024). ### NetBox version v3.7.0 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality In some configurations, it is possible to have multiple encryption/authentication/group algorithms selected in a single proposal. Currently, in v3.7.0 only one encryption algorithm or authentication algorithm or DH group can be selected per proposal. It would be nice to be able to select multiple options for each field. ### Use case A proposal like this is currently not possible to documented. crypto ikev2 proposal ike-proposal-1 encryption aes-cbc-256 aes-cbc-128 integrity sha512 sha256 group 21 20 19 ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 20:45:16 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:45:16 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:45:17 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2024):

Thanks for your interest in helping improve NetBox.

If this issue had arrived during the 3.7.0 beta period, a conversation about allowing multiple values in IKE proposals might have led to us taking up the suggestion. Unfortunately the modeling of proposals is now finalized, and altering it isn't something we currently have the resources to take on.

I'm therefore closing this issue, but I encourage you to start a discussion so that we can get a feel for how many other NetBox users would benefit from this change.

@jeffgdotorg commented on GitHub (Jan 16, 2024): Thanks for your interest in helping improve NetBox. If this issue had arrived during the 3.7.0 beta period, a conversation about allowing multiple values in IKE proposals might have led to us taking up the suggestion. Unfortunately the modeling of proposals is now finalized, and altering it isn't something we currently have the resources to take on. I'm therefore closing this issue, but I encourage you to start a discussion so that we can get a feel for how many other NetBox users would benefit from this change.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:45:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mbneteng commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024):

I agree with @markh0338 this is a limitation with the model. Utilizing multiple algorithms or DH groups is very common in proposals. These proposals are typically the most complex ones and having the ability to model them in NB would be very beneficial.

@mbneteng commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024): I agree with @markh0338 this is a limitation with the model. Utilizing multiple algorithms or DH groups is very common in proposals. These proposals are typically the most complex ones and having the ability to model them in NB would be very beneficial.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:45:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024):

@mbneteng this would have been actionable feedback during the monhth-long v3.7 beta period. However, now that v3.7.0 has been released we will not be making any breaking changes to the VPN data model in the near future.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 17, 2024): @mbneteng this would have been actionable feedback during the monhth-long v3.7 beta period. However, now that v3.7.0 has been released we will not be making any breaking changes to the VPN data model in the near future.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#9085
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?