starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Saved Filter doesn't appear in cable add view #8979

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:43:35 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:43:35 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @llamafilm on GitHub (Dec 16, 2023).

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v3.6-2.7.0

Python Version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a saved filter with type "DCIM Device" and parameters {"location_id": ["5"]}
  2. Select a device interface and try to connect it
  3. On the "add a new cable" page, open the selector dialog

Expected Behavior

I should be able to see the saved filter

Observed Behavior

I see an empty list.

If I uncheck and re-check the saved filter section then it works, as shown in this video.

https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/3991046/08ab875c-6d04-446f-9bd1-b9f4e8ae80e6

Originally created by @llamafilm on GitHub (Dec 16, 2023). ### Deployment Type Self-hosted ### NetBox Version v3.6-2.7.0 ### Python Version 3.11 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a saved filter with type "DCIM Device" and parameters `{"location_id": ["5"]}` 2. Select a device interface and try to connect it 3. On the "add a new cable" page, open the selector dialog ### Expected Behavior I should be able to see the saved filter ### Observed Behavior I see an empty list. If I uncheck and re-check the saved filter section then it works, as shown in this video. https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/assets/3991046/08ab875c-6d04-446f-9bd1-b9f4e8ae80e6
adam added the type: bugstatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 20:43:35 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:43:35 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:43:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023):

Thank you for opening a bug report. I was unable to reproduce the reported behavior on NetBox v3.6.7. Please re-confirm the reported behavior on the current stable release and adjust your post above as necessary. Remember to provide detailed steps that someone else can follow using a clean installation of NetBox to reproduce the issue. Remember to include the steps taken to create any initial objects or other data.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023): Thank you for opening a bug report. I was unable to reproduce the reported behavior on NetBox v3.6.7. Please re-confirm the reported behavior on the current stable release and adjust your post above as necessary. Remember to provide detailed steps that someone else can follow using a clean installation of NetBox to reproduce the issue. Remember to include the steps taken to create any initial objects or other data.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:43:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023):

v3.6-2.7.0

That netbox-docker tag can be different versions depending on when the image was pulled. The issue you describe was fixed in 3.6.7 and looking at the video it seems you are not on that version.

For posterity, it was fixed in this PR: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/14387

The typescript change was because of a bug that was also present for the Saved Filter field. If a collapsible field is defaulted to be shown, the list will not populate when opening like it is supposed to, but only when the user starts typing.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023): > v3.6-2.7.0 That netbox-docker tag can be different versions depending on when the image was pulled. The issue you describe was fixed in 3.6.7 and looking at the video it seems you are not on that version. For posterity, it was fixed in this PR: https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/pull/14387 > The typescript change was because of a bug that was also present for the Saved Filter field. If a collapsible field is defaulted to be shown, the list will not populate when opening like it is supposed to, but only when the user starts typing.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:43:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@llamafilm commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023):

@kkthxbye-code thanks, I thought that version tag was enough. I don't understand why that tag has 2 different version strings (3.6 and 2.7). I just updated the docker image to the latest and can confirm it's fixed now.

@llamafilm commented on GitHub (Dec 18, 2023): @kkthxbye-code thanks, I thought that version tag was enough. I don't understand why that tag has 2 different version strings (3.6 and 2.7). I just updated the docker image to the latest and can confirm it's fixed now.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: revisions needed type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8979
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?