Add status attribute in the search results for devices #8950

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:43:15 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @markkuleinio on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

V3.7-beta1

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Currently (in the new search result list of v3.7-beta1) the following fields/attributes are shown for devices that are shown in search results:

'site', 'location', 'rack', 'device_type', 'role', 'tenant', 'platform', 'serial', 'asset_tag', 'description',

I propose adding status field there as well, preferably somewhere near the beginning of the list.

Use case

When search results are shown it is important to see which devices (if any) are active and which are decommissioning etc.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None (as far as I understand)

Originally created by @markkuleinio on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version V3.7-beta1 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Currently (in the new search result list of v3.7-beta1) the following fields/attributes are shown for devices that are shown in search results: 'site', 'location', 'rack', 'device_type', 'role', 'tenant', 'platform', 'serial', 'asset_tag', 'description', I propose adding status field there as well, preferably somewhere near the beginning of the list. ### Use case When search results are shown it is important to see which devices (if any) are active and which are decommissioning etc. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None (as far as I understand)
adam added the status: acceptedtype: featurebeta labels 2025-12-29 20:43:15 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:43:15 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023):

It's probably worth doing a full audit across all models to identify any other fields that were omitted in error.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2023): It's probably worth doing a full audit across all models to identify any other fields that were omitted in error.
Author
Owner

@sleepinggenius2 commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2023):

Would it be possible to make these lists configurable, maybe like we can do for choice sets today? For example, I can think of scenarios within our deployment where it would be nice to include particular custom fields in the display attributes on search results.

@sleepinggenius2 commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2023): Would it be possible to make these lists configurable, maybe like we can do for choice sets today? For example, I can think of scenarios within our deployment where it would be nice to include particular custom fields in the display attributes on search results.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8950