repoTakeSome/organization_fork@https://github.com/enterprises/botbinc-thecompany #8799

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @WatchTower001110 on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023).

So, I did a little research on the config.

It appears this is for microtik.

Here would be a full config:

mpls vpls TEST 10
 signaling bgp
  ve-id 10
  exit-signaling
 exit-vpls
!
service-template TEST
 match outer-vlan 10
!
interface xe2
 switchport
 mpls-vpls TEST service-template TEST
  exit-if-vpls

How this should be modelled in NetBox:

(1) Physical Interface (xe2 as a tagged port)
(1+) Virtual Interfaces (x2.10, tagged port with vid 10 as the allowed tag -- tagged/untagged could all be viable here)
(1) VPLS L2VPN: TEST, Identifier: 10
(1+) L2VPN Termination (Interface xe2.10)

All this being said, I do not believe this is a valid FR as it does not meet real-world implementation details. I am going to convert this to a discussion. You are free to re-open an issue once this is more fully fleshed out, if there is anything to flesh out.

Originally posted by @DanSheps in https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/discussions/10419#discussioncomment-3691031

Originally created by @WatchTower001110 on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023). So, I did a little research on the config. It appears this is for microtik. Here would be a full config: ``` mpls vpls TEST 10 signaling bgp ve-id 10 exit-signaling exit-vpls ! service-template TEST match outer-vlan 10 ! interface xe2 switchport mpls-vpls TEST service-template TEST exit-if-vpls ``` How this should be modelled in NetBox: (1) Physical Interface (xe2 as a tagged port) (1+) Virtual Interfaces (x2.10, tagged port with vid 10 as the allowed tag -- tagged/untagged could all be viable here) (1) VPLS L2VPN: TEST, Identifier: 10 (1+) L2VPN Termination (Interface xe2.10) All this being said, I do not believe this is a valid FR as it does not meet real-world implementation details. I am going to convert this to a discussion. You are free to re-open an issue once this is more fully fleshed out, if there is anything to flesh out. _Originally posted by @DanSheps in https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/discussions/10419#discussioncomment-3691031_
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023):

Issues must be submitted using one of the available templates.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023): Issues must be submitted using one of the [available templates](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/new/choose).
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8799