starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Update Reference>Conditions example code after feature #9876 addition #8798

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @kenny-y-dev on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @kenny-y-dev on GitHub.

Change Type

Correction

Area

Other

Proposed Changes

With the addition of feature #9876 to handle conditional tag checks by parsing the tags list of dictionaries, the attr key in a conditional check requires a key in the tag dict to check against. For example, if checking for a tag with the slug exempt, the check would be:

{ "attr": "tags.slug", "value": "exempt", "op": "contains" }

The current conditional example in the documentation appears to have the intention of checking for the presence of a tag, though does not currently work correctly with only "attr": "tags and no deeper key selection.

Originally created by @kenny-y-dev on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023). Originally assigned to: @kenny-y-dev on GitHub. ### Change Type Correction ### Area Other ### Proposed Changes With the addition of feature #9876 to handle conditional tag checks by parsing the `tags` list of dictionaries, the `attr` key in a conditional check requires a key in the tag dict to check against. For example, if checking for a tag with the slug `exempt`, the check would be: `{ "attr": "tags.slug", "value": "exempt", "op": "contains" }` The [current conditional example](https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/reference/conditions/) in the documentation appears to have the intention of checking for the presence of a tag, though does not currently work correctly with only `"attr": "tags` and no deeper key selection.
adam added the status: acceptedtype: documentation labels 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:41:18 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:41:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kenny-y-dev commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023):

Have a PR ready to go for the quick doc fix, though saw it may auto close if the issue isn't assigned to me. Happy to submit if assigned; thanks!

@kenny-y-dev commented on GitHub (Nov 1, 2023): Have a PR ready to go for the quick doc fix, though saw it may auto close if the issue isn't assigned to me. Happy to submit if assigned; thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: documentation
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8798
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?