starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Range "568" is invalid when creating interface with names vlan [568,570] #8590

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:38:33 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:33 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @pv2b on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @DanSheps on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.6.1

Python version

3.11

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Go to an existing device and click on add interfaces.
  2. Set the interface name to vlan [568,570]
  3. Fill in a type (any type is fine)

Expected Behavior

Two interfaces named vlan 568 and vlan 570 are created.

Observed Behavior

An error message is shown:

Range "568" is invalid

NOTE: The below works but will of course not create the appropriate names:
vlan [a568,a570]

I believe the error is in parse_alphanumeric_range in netbox/utilities/forms/utils.py. I think that function is a little overdue for some refactoring, and I'm happy to take it on if accepted.

Originally created by @pv2b on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023). Originally assigned to: @DanSheps on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.6.1 ### Python version 3.11 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Go to an existing device and click on add interfaces. 2. Set the interface name to `vlan [568,570]` 3. Fill in a type (any type is fine) ### Expected Behavior Two interfaces named `vlan 568` and `vlan 570` are created. ### Observed Behavior An error message is shown: Range "568" is invalid NOTE: The below works but will of course not create the appropriate names: `vlan [a568,a570]` I believe the error is in parse_alphanumeric_range in netbox/utilities/forms/utils.py. I think that function is a little overdue for some refactoring, and I'm happy to take it on if accepted.
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedseverity: low labels 2025-12-29 20:38:33 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:38:34 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:34 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023):

Thanks @pv2b, I've assigned this to you.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023): Thanks @pv2b, I've assigned this to you.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023):

This also shows up with interfaces, FYI.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023): This also shows up with interfaces, FYI.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pv2b commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023):

This also shows up with interfaces, FYI.

This bug report is about interfaces, yes. I'm not sure what you mean to say with this?

@pv2b commented on GitHub (Sep 8, 2023): > This also shows up with interfaces, FYI. This bug report is about interfaces, yes. I'm not sure what you mean to say with this?
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2023):

This also shows up with interfaces, FYI.

This bug report is about interfaces, yes. I'm not sure what you mean to say with this?

Sorry, case of the fridays, was thinking it was with vlans.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 11, 2023): > > This also shows up with interfaces, FYI. > > This bug report is about interfaces, yes. I'm not sure what you mean to say with this? Sorry, case of the fridays, was thinking it was with vlans.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:36 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@markh0338 commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2023):

I'll just add that we're running into this issue as well and merging in #13730 seems to resolve our problems. It would be nice to see this merged into a release.

@markh0338 commented on GitHub (Nov 30, 2023): I'll just add that we're running into this issue as well and merging in #13730 seems to resolve our problems. It would be nice to see this merged into a release.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label severity: low status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8590
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?