starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Default does not allow "null" #8572

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:38:19 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:19 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @DanSheps on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.6.0

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a custom field set named Test ("test","Test"\n"tester","Tester"\n"testing","Testing")
  2. Create a custom field based off a selection list
    a. Name: Test
    b. Object: Circuits
    c. Type: Multiple Selection
    d. Required: False
    e. Default: null
    f. Choice Set: Test
  3. Save

Expected Behavior

Custom field saves

Observed Behavior

NotNullViolation: null value in column "default" of relation "extras_customfield" violates not-null constraint

Originally created by @DanSheps on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.6.0 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a custom field set named Test ("test","Test"\n"tester","Tester"\n"testing","Testing") 2. Create a custom field based off a selection list a. Name: Test b. Object: Circuits c. Type: Multiple Selection d. Required: False e. Default: null f. Choice Set: Test 3. Save ### Expected Behavior Custom field saves ### Observed Behavior NotNullViolation: null value in column "default" of relation "extras_customfield" violates not-null constraint
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:38:19 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023):

This may be a red-herring or something. Looks like a brand new test-db allows null values on custom fields. I am going to try and track this down.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023): This may be a red-herring or something. Looks like a brand new test-db allows null values on custom fields. I am going to try and track this down.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:38:21 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023):

Looks like a migration wasn't properly applied on my prod instance, closing this out.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Sep 5, 2023): Looks like a migration wasn't properly applied on my prod instance, closing this out.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8572
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?