starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

ip-address filter modifiers (__ic, __nic) for "interface" not functioning #8467

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:37:08 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:37:08 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @DCAuto on GitHub (Aug 14, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.4.5

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

using pynetbox module searching for all lo0 interfaces with a "." in them returns the "base" interface as well.

nb.ipam.ip_addresses.filter(device='TEST-DEVICE', interface__ic='lo0.')

The __ic and __nic modifiers do not function when filtering for assigned-interface-name

Expected Behavior

Returns a list of addresses associated with "lo0.0", "lo0.1", "lo0.2" but omits the base interface "lo0"

Observed Behavior

All 4 addresses are returned.

Originally created by @DCAuto on GitHub (Aug 14, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.4.5 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce using pynetbox module searching for all lo0 interfaces with a "." in them returns the "base" interface as well. nb.ipam.ip_addresses.filter(device='TEST-DEVICE', interface__ic='lo0.') The __ic and __nic modifiers do not function when filtering for assigned-interface-name ### Expected Behavior Returns a list of addresses associated with "lo0.0", "lo0.1", "lo0.2" but omits the base interface "lo0" ### Observed Behavior All 4 addresses are returned.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:37:08 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:37:09 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Aug 14, 2023):

This is expected as it is documented:

https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/reference/filtering/#foreign-keys-other-fields

Certain other fields, namely foreign key relationships support just the negation expression

Closing as this is not a bug. A feature request would be needed to evaluate changing it.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Aug 14, 2023): This is expected as it is documented: https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/reference/filtering/#foreign-keys-other-fields > Certain other fields, namely foreign key relationships support just the negation expression Closing as this is not a bug. A feature request would be needed to evaluate changing it.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8467
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?