Adding Front Ports with range #8310

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:35:12 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @bsdking on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.5.5

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

Goto Device.
Add 'Add a new front port'
Select Device
Give name [0-9]
Assign Type
Assign Rear Port

Get error:

Expected Behavior

To see the range of ports created

Observed Behavior

Get error:

Server Error
There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator.

The complete exception is provided below:
<class 'IndexError'>

list index out of range

Python version: 3.9.16
NetBox version: 3.5.5

Originally created by @bsdking on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.5.5 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce Goto Device. Add 'Add a new front port' Select Device Give name [0-9] Assign Type Assign Rear Port Get error: ### Expected Behavior To see the range of ports created ### Observed Behavior Get error: Server Error There was a problem with your request. Please contact an administrator. The complete exception is provided below: <class 'IndexError'> list index out of range Python version: 3.9.16 NetBox version: 3.5.5
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:35:12 +01:00
Author
Owner

@peterbaumert commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023):

You created corresponding rear ports before with same indexes?

@peterbaumert commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023): You created corresponding rear ports before with same indexes?
Author
Owner

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023):

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2023): Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.
Author
Owner

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2023):

Closing as there has been no response.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jul 23, 2023): Closing as there has been no response.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8310