starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Enable creation of QinQ VLANs #83

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 15:31:56 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:56 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @markve-sa on GitHub (Jun 29, 2016).

Ability to add SVLANs and CVLANs. Perhaps a parent child relationship

This and #105 and my life is complete

Originally created by @markve-sa on GitHub (Jun 29, 2016). Ability to add SVLANs and CVLANs. Perhaps a parent child relationship This and #105 and my life is complete
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 15:31:56 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2017):

This has been open for a long time with no movement. Unfortunately, this seems to be a very niche feature that probably doesn't justify the complexity it would introduce. I'm going to close this feature request.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 28, 2017): This has been open for a long time with no movement. Unfortunately, this seems to be a very niche feature that probably doesn't justify the complexity it would introduce. I'm going to close this feature request.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2017):

Any chance we can reopen this? 802.1ad is being used more and more...
We have to use VRFs for IPs and VLAN Groups to do this currently and it makes things a tad messy for us.
Not sure how complex it would be to effectively duplicate the VLAN functions, Call it ServiceTAG and add a new column for ServiceTAG under vlans?

@cre8rnz commented on GitHub (Jul 7, 2017): Any chance we can reopen this? 802.1ad is being used more and more... We have to use VRFs for IPs and VLAN Groups to do this currently and it makes things a tad messy for us. Not sure how complex it would be to effectively duplicate the VLAN functions, Call it ServiceTAG and add a new column for ServiceTAG under vlans?
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@OsirisS13 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2019):

Another vote for re-opening this issue, Netbox is a great product for tracking enterprise level infrastructure and networks, but the addition of being able to represent 802.1ad will increase its usefulness in the service provider realm.

@OsirisS13 commented on GitHub (Mar 12, 2019): Another vote for re-opening this issue, Netbox is a great product for tracking enterprise level infrastructure and networks, but the addition of being able to represent 802.1ad will increase its usefulness in the service provider realm.
adam commented 2025-12-29 15:31:58 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@mactizzle commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2019):

+1 for reopening. Tagging cVLAN/sVLAN separately would make for tracking DSL / Fiber equipment and outside plant infrastructure easier.

@mactizzle commented on GitHub (Apr 17, 2019): +1 for reopening. Tagging cVLAN/sVLAN separately would make for tracking DSL / Fiber equipment and outside plant infrastructure easier.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#83
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?