starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add Brazilian power outlet standard #8245

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:34:18 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:18 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @BrunoBlanes on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @BrunoBlanes on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.5.4

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Add Brazilian power outlet standard as a power outlet type.

Use case

Power outlets in Brazil are standardized by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas).
Our outlets were standardized in 2006 and have been enforced since 2011, making every manufacture that wishes to sell its products within national territory to comply with it. The standard is called NBR 14136 and is based on the IEC 60906-1 standard.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @BrunoBlanes on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023). Originally assigned to: @BrunoBlanes on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.5.4 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality Add Brazilian power outlet standard as a power outlet type. ### Use case Power outlets in Brazil are standardized by the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards (ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas). Our outlets were standardized in 2006 and have been enforced since 2011, making every manufacture that wishes to sell its products within national territory to comply with it. The standard is called [NBR 14136](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60906-1#Brazilian_NBR_14136_standard_) and is based on the [IEC 60906-1](https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60906-1) standard. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 20:34:18 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:34:18 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:18 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

What is the difference between the two?

From my (limited) look, there isn't much difference

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): What is the difference between the two? From my (limited) look, there isn't much difference
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

The main difference is that while the European is limited to 16A, our standard defines two types of plugs:

  • 10A (4mm pins)
  • 20A (4.8mm pins)

That was made in order to stop users from overloading circuits.

Also, our standard does not allow for a flat pin format, there's no layout difference for different circuit voltage.

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): The main difference is that while the European is limited to 16A, our standard defines two types of plugs: - 10A (4mm pins) - 20A (4.8mm pins) That was made in order to stop users from overloading circuits. Also, our standard does not allow for a flat pin format, there's no layout difference for different circuit voltage.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

So you would need two plugs, correct?

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): So you would need two plugs, correct?
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

Mostly, if your equipment is rated for 10A+, it would need to have a 20A plug, otherwise 10A.
So yes, two new plug types.

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): Mostly, if your equipment is rated for 10A+, it would need to have a 20A plug, otherwise 10A. So yes, two new plug types.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:34:19 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023):

I could take this issue if you'd like.

@BrunoBlanes commented on GitHub (Jun 26, 2023): I could take this issue if you'd like.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8245
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?