Add opportunity to assign Config Context based on Device state #8086

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:32:12 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @drobnymichal on GitHub (May 18, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.5.1

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

I would like to assign a Config Context object to a set of Devices based on the Status attribute.

Use case

We have use cases where we need to assign Config Context only to Active Devices.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @drobnymichal on GitHub (May 18, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.5.1 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality I would like to assign a Config Context object to a set of Devices based on the Status attribute. ### Use case We have use cases where we need to assign Config Context only to Active Devices. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 20:32:12 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:32:12 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (May 19, 2023):

Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our contributing guide, a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (May 19, 2023): Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023):

This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2023): This issue is being closed as no further information has been provided. If you would like to revisit this topic, please first modify your original post to include all the requested detail, and then ask that the issue be reopened.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#8086