Add ability to hide URL in custom field but show appearance in Custom links #7942

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:30:20 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
Owner

Originally created by @deku-m on GitHub (Apr 26, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.4.7

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

When using the combination of custom field and custom links to show something as a top button.
These custom field can be hidden from the UI.
But then it is not possible anymore to fill in the information on the editting page and reuse it to create a custom link for a button on the top without showing the custom field.

Suggestion is to hide from overview (as a hidden custom field) and have possibility to fill in the information when editted the page.
Showing up on top as a button. This also saves some space on the general overview page where you provide the custom field.

Use case

Just hiding the information that might be implemented once and dont show the link twice in the overview.
Custom field and as custom links button.

Database changes

Dont know

External dependencies

Dont know

Originally created by @deku-m on GitHub (Apr 26, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.4.7 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality When using the combination of custom field and custom links to show something as a top button. These custom field can be hidden from the UI. But then it is not possible anymore to fill in the information on the editting page and reuse it to create a custom link for a button on the top without showing the custom field. Suggestion is to hide from overview (as a hidden custom field) and have possibility to fill in the information when editted the page. Showing up on top as a button. This also saves some space on the general overview page where you provide the custom field. ### Use case Just hiding the information that might be implemented once and dont show the link twice in the overview. Custom field and as custom links button. ### Database changes Dont know ### External dependencies Dont know
adam added the type: featurepending closurestatus: under review labels 2025-12-29 20:30:20 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:30:20 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 5, 2023):

Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our contributing guide, a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (May 5, 2023): Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.
Author
Owner

@deku-m commented on GitHub (May 8, 2023):

As with the combination of custom fields and customlinks you can create a button to forward to a website of your choice as seen in the 2 screenshots created for example cisco site.
Custom field:
afbeelding
Custom links:
afbeelding

Overview:
afbeelding
You see the button and the create links which are connected.

I was wondering with this request if you can add the ability to hide it on the overview only in the customfield but still can edit it on the edit page and show it as button only in the right top corner.

Because when setting the UI visibility is set to hidden:
afbeelding
You are not able to change it anymore afterwards until you unhide and hide it again.

So i was asking if the hidden function perhaps could have a change or 4th option or something to have the hidden function only on the overviewpage and hide the custom field but not on the editting page? So it is still possible to change the URL in editting mode and not being showed as the customfield part in the overview.

@deku-m commented on GitHub (May 8, 2023): As with the combination of custom fields and customlinks you can create a button to forward to a website of your choice as seen in the 2 screenshots created for example cisco site. **Custom field:** ![afbeelding](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37069737/236743593-08498aba-b4d9-46e3-9237-6652e5a62f38.png) **Custom links:** ![afbeelding](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37069737/236744357-70114451-fda6-4c33-a38f-813d320d6088.png) **Overview:** ![afbeelding](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37069737/236744622-80ec5253-ea43-410c-81b6-ef6e6d132205.png) You see the button and the create links which are connected. I was wondering with this request if you can add the ability to hide it on the overview only in the customfield but still can edit it on the edit page and show it as button only in the right top corner. Because when setting the UI visibility is set to hidden: ![afbeelding](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/37069737/236745849-6779b24b-983f-4f35-98c2-2a4d1c80e176.png) You are not able to change it anymore afterwards until you unhide and hide it again. So i was asking if the hidden function perhaps could have a change or 4th option or something to have the hidden function only on the overviewpage and hide the custom field but not on the editting page? So it is still possible to change the URL in editting mode and not being showed as the customfield part in the overview.
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Do not attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 7, 2023): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. **Do not** attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2023):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Oct 9, 2023): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7942