starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Dynamic model widget shows unfiltered value #7871

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:29:12 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:12 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @apishark on GitHub (Apr 6, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.4.4

Python version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

Browse to http://localhost:8001/dcim/devices/add/
Select a Manufacturer
Select a Device type
Select another Manufacturer

Expected Behavior

Device type shows filtered value

Observed Behavior

Device type shows unfiltered value

image
image

Originally created by @apishark on GitHub (Apr 6, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.4.4 ### Python version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce Browse to http://localhost:8001/dcim/devices/add/ Select a Manufacturer Select a Device type Select another Manufacturer ### Expected Behavior Device type shows filtered value ### Observed Behavior Device type shows unfiltered value ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/98494314/230364931-9e8be3a1-e427-4996-9145-563fbdeb683c.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/98494314/230364986-e8c0d246-61c7-4b17-8314-6850a080edb8.png)
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 20:29:12 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:29:13 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023):

Could you please clean up your description above? It appears you've pasted the same content twice under "steps to reproduce" and "expected behavior."

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023): Could you please clean up your description above? It appears you've pasted the same content twice under "steps to reproduce" and "expected behavior."
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@apishark commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023):

One is UNfiltered and the other is filtered.
In plain English, an unfiltered value is shown in the Device Type, which is not the expected behavior.

@apishark commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023): One is UNfiltered and the other is filtered. In plain English, an unfiltered value is shown in the Device Type, which is not the expected behavior.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023):

Ok, please update your description above to reflect that, rather the duplicating the reproduction steps in their entirety.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023): Ok, please update your description above to reflect that, rather the duplicating the reproduction steps in their entirety.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:13 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@apishark commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023):

NetBox version
v3.4.4

Python version
3.10

Steps to Reproduce
Browse to http://localhost:8001/dcim/devices/add/
Select a Manufacturer
Select a Device type
Select another Manufacturer
Device type shows unfiltered value

Expected Behavior
Device type shows filtered value

Observed Behavior
image
image

@apishark commented on GitHub (Apr 7, 2023): NetBox version v3.4.4 Python version 3.10 Steps to Reproduce Browse to http://localhost:8001/dcim/devices/add/ Select a Manufacturer Select a Device type Select another Manufacturer Device type shows unfiltered value Expected Behavior Device type shows filtered value Observed Behavior ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/98494314/230630840-a9626cd4-56f0-4b72-a5b1-46845517ad4d.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/98494314/230630858-2956ba45-037d-494d-b9a9-d132841f0554.png)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:29:14 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (May 10, 2023):

The manufacturer field does not exist in the device creation for in 3.5. The devicetype now has the advanced object selection field. As such there is nothing to fix here.

Also I'm not sure what the initial issue was. When we filter a DynamicModelChoiceField based on another DynamicModelChoice field we do not clear the currently selected value, but the filter is still applied to other non-selected values. I'm not sure if we wanted to change that, as it's pretty consistent throughout the UI.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (May 10, 2023): The manufacturer field does not exist in the device creation for in 3.5. The devicetype now has the advanced object selection field. As such there is nothing to fix here. Also I'm not sure what the initial issue was. When we filter a DynamicModelChoiceField based on another DynamicModelChoice field we do not clear the currently selected value, but the filter is still applied to other non-selected values. I'm not sure if we wanted to change that, as it's pretty consistent throughout the UI.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7871
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?