Implement discrete layer two domains with a site #77

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 15:31:41 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Jun 29, 2016).

Currently, a user can create multiple VLANs with the same VID and name within a site. This is allowed to provide the maximum flexibility when documenting real-world networks. However, it can also be very confusing, as there is no additional information to differentiate "VLAN 100 (ToR P2P)" from another "VLAN 100 (ToR P2P)," for example.

The proposal here is to implement a new model to represent a discrete zone within a site, within which each VLAN must have a unique VID (and name?). It should be fairly straightforward to extend the current schema to support this.

Originally created by @jeremystretch on GitHub (Jun 29, 2016). Currently, a user can create multiple VLANs with the same VID and name within a site. This is allowed to provide the maximum flexibility when documenting real-world networks. However, it can also be very confusing, as there is no additional information to differentiate "VLAN 100 (ToR P2P)" from another "VLAN 100 (ToR P2P)," for example. The proposal here is to implement a new model to represent a discrete zone within a site, within which each VLAN must have a unique VID (and name?). It should be fairly straightforward to extend the current schema to support this.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 15:31:41 +01:00
Author
Owner

@mdlayher commented on GitHub (Jun 30, 2016):

https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/147 was filed recently as a duplicate of this issue. Linking it here because it provides some great details that may be useful in designing this feature.

@mdlayher commented on GitHub (Jun 30, 2016): https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox/issues/147 was filed recently as a duplicate of this issue. Linking it here because it provides some great details that may be useful in designing this feature.
Author
Owner

@rdujardin commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2016):

Accordingly with #235, we could drop the VLAN site assignment and replace it with an optional discrete zone assignment, discrete zones being assigned to a site (maybe optionnally too) ?

@rdujardin commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2016): Accordingly with #235, we could drop the VLAN site assignment and replace it with an optional discrete zone assignment, discrete zones being assigned to a site (maybe optionnally too) ?
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#77