starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add HP IRF interface type to stacking choices #767

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 16:25:37 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:25:37 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @afics on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017).

Issue type: feature request

Minor request to have HP IRF (Intelligent Resilient Framework) added as an interface type choice under the "Stacking" section.

Originally created by @afics on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017). ### Issue type: feature request Minor request to have HP IRF (Intelligent Resilient Framework) added as an interface type choice under the "Stacking" section.
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 16:25:37 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:25:38 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017):

If this is a physical interface type, can you please provide a link to its documentation? If not, you'll want to create an interface using the appropriate physical type instead.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017): If this is a physical interface type, can you please provide a link to its documentation? If not, you'll want to create an interface using the appropriate physical type instead.
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:25:38 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@leandroteleco commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017):

HP IRF is for Comware switches and the physical interface is normal service port like RJ45, but DAC cables with SFP+ (10 Gbps) o QSFP+ (40 Gbps) is more frecuent. http://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?sp4ts.oid=5230358&docId=emr_na-c03187005&docLocale=en_US

@leandroteleco commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2017): HP IRF is for Comware switches and the physical interface is normal service port like RJ45, but DAC cables with SFP+ (10 Gbps) o QSFP+ (40 Gbps) is more frecuent. http://h20566.www2.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?sp4ts.oid=5230358&docId=emr_na-c03187005&docLocale=en_US
adam commented 2025-12-29 16:25:38 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@afics commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017):

As @leandroteleco said, this is no physical interface type.

@afics commented on GitHub (Mar 15, 2017): As @leandroteleco said, this is no physical interface type.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#767
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?