starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow duplicate private IP aggregates in multi tenancy use cases #7641

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:26:21 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:26:21 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jasper- on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023).

NetBox version

v3.4.4

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

When managing infrastructure for multiple customers (tenants) we would like to allow registration of private IP-ranges for those clients. Obviously these aggregates (like 10.0.0.0/8) will overlap.

The new functionality should allow agregates to overlap when different RIR and Tenant are selected.

Use case

NexBox users managing infrastructure for multiple customers that have overlapping ip-aggregates.

Database changes

allow ip aggregates to overlap when different RIR / Tenant (group) is assigned to the aggregate.
maybe add 'are you sure' checkbox

External dependencies

Originally created by @jasper- on GitHub (Feb 14, 2023). ### NetBox version v3.4.4 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality When managing infrastructure for multiple customers (tenants) we would like to allow registration of private IP-ranges for those clients. Obviously these aggregates (like 10.0.0.0/8) will overlap. The new functionality should allow agregates to overlap when different RIR and Tenant are selected. ### Use case NexBox users managing infrastructure for multiple customers that have overlapping ip-aggregates. ### Database changes allow ip aggregates to overlap when different RIR / Tenant (group) is assigned to the aggregate. maybe add 'are you sure' checkbox ### External dependencies -
adam added the type: featurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 20:26:21 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:26:21 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:26:22 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2023):

Thanks for your contribution.

Are VRFs not working for this purpose in your use-case? I understand that they do not apply to aggregates, but technically, there is one and only RFC1918 172.16.0.0/12 aggregate that exists, for instance.

@jsenecal commented on GitHub (Feb 16, 2023): Thanks for your contribution. Are VRFs not working for this purpose in your use-case? I understand that they do not apply to aggregates, but technically, there is one and only RFC1918 172.16.0.0/12 aggregate that exists, for instance.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:26:22 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2023):

Closing this for inactivity.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2023): Closing this for inactivity.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: revisions needed type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7641
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?