starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 13:53:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Cable trace with extra socket #7566

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:25:30 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:30 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @tomaszcwik1 on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023).

NetBox version

3.3.7

Python version

3.8

Steps to Reproduce

i add relation from Patch Panel - > Socket (similar to Patch pannel Rear port + Front Port) -> then to Access point
trace from AP is OK:

image

but from Switch i don,t see connection from this perspective
image

and from trace :
image

but if i go to Socket 129
image

and then pick relation
image

i see two different Relater Paths
image

image

Expected Behavior

Proper display relation from Switch perspective

Observed Behavior

no error just no display relation

Originally created by @tomaszcwik1 on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023). ### NetBox version 3.3.7 ### Python version 3.8 ### Steps to Reproduce i add relation from Patch Panel - > Socket (similar to Patch pannel Rear port + Front Port) -> then to Access point trace from AP is OK: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214847813-ed59538f-b174-4f0c-9199-53bfb6f45bc3.png) but from Switch i don,t see connection from this perspective ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214847974-a7c283fa-d290-4fe4-aeaa-69a0aeed0ec0.png) and from trace : ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214848040-16c03cd2-6bbf-404f-b79f-f995114d7f73.png) but if i go to Socket 129 ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214848217-dd7aff7c-b31f-473b-a93e-a64c2fc22b4e.png) and then pick relation ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214848412-be7463a9-122b-4406-bb1d-3be8e931cb6d.png) i see two different Relater Paths ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214848605-d42ecaf2-a0aa-4132-8c74-aaf6cd8cee62.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214848652-e6fe950f-3d8c-4ccb-9c76-aa86539a45ec.png) ### Expected Behavior Proper display relation from Switch perspective ### Observed Behavior no error just no display relation
adam added the type: bugstatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 20:25:30 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:25:30 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023):

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023): Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023):

i try add this in demo, but issue is not effect.
could you please analize screanshot what i prepare

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023): i try add this in demo, but issue is not effect. could you please analize screanshot what i prepare
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023):

in device side i see proper connection,
image
but from SWT i don't see relation
image

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023): in device side i see proper connection, ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214851528-d2095935-8993-43c4-985d-4ff7a955cb88.png) but from SWT i don't see relation ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/111953230/214851720-14a65b8e-7071-4b08-b9ba-0a5af18bbed2.png)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023):

i try add this in demo, but issue is not effect.

Which suggests that the issue has either likely be resolved, or your steps to replicate the behavior are inaccurate. Either way, you'll need to make some effort on your end to determine the appropriate next steps. I suggest starting by upgrading to the most recent NetBox release (v3.4.3).

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023): > i try add this in demo, but issue is not effect. Which suggests that the issue has either likely be resolved, or your steps to replicate the behavior are inaccurate. Either way, you'll need to make some effort on your end to determine the appropriate next steps. I suggest starting by upgrading to the most recent NetBox release (v3.4.3).
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:25:31 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023):

ok so i try to update netbox thanks

@tomaszcwik1 commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2023): ok so i try to update netbox thanks
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: revisions needed type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7566
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?