starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Allow for PowerFeeds to be searched from their related objects name #7470

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:23:45 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:23:45 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @jsenecal on GitHub (Jan 6, 2023).

Originally assigned to: @arthanson on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.4.1

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

When searching for a PowerFeed, its is not currently possible to use the PowerPanel name as a "quick" filter in the search field.

The proposal is to add these to the filterset at dcim/filtersets.py#L1841

Use case

Colocation providers will sometimes name their circuits in a way that would not identify their panel,

POWER0175624P > MTL71.4.415.0.RPP.B6.UPS500-B

Searching for "UPS500" yields no results in that case.

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @jsenecal on GitHub (Jan 6, 2023). Originally assigned to: @arthanson on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.4.1 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality When searching for a PowerFeed, its is not currently possible to use the PowerPanel name as a "quick" filter in the search field. The proposal is to add these to the filterset at [dcim/filtersets.py#L1841](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/dcim/filtersets.py#L1841) ### Use case Colocation providers will sometimes name their circuits in a way that would not identify their panel, POWER0175624P > MTL71.4.415.0.RPP.B6.UPS500-B Searching for "UPS500" yields no results in that case. ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 20:23:45 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:23:46 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:23:46 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2023):

@jsenecal do you still intend to work on this?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2023): @jsenecal do you still intend to work on this?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7470
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?