starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Device Roles: Add Virtual Maschines view #7383

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:22:40 +01:00 by adam · 7 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:40 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ShellBoyAFK on GitHub (Dec 18, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @abhi1693 on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.3.9

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Under Device Roles, only the Devices are displayed in the detailed view of the individual roles.

But not the virtual machines associated with them.

This does not look complete. Maybe this was forgotten.

vms

Use case

I think the use case is obvious or?

So that you can see immediately in the respective role which VMs have this role

Database changes

?

External dependencies

?

Originally created by @ShellBoyAFK on GitHub (Dec 18, 2022). Originally assigned to: @abhi1693 on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.3.9 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Under Device Roles, only the Devices are displayed in the detailed view of the individual roles. But not the virtual machines associated with them. This does not look complete. Maybe this was forgotten. ![vms](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/96151517/208300381-3bebcccb-7698-4dc4-9d3d-8c44323d4d6a.PNG) ### Use case I think the use case is obvious or? So that you can see immediately in the respective role which VMs have this role ### Database changes ? ### External dependencies ?
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 20:22:40 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:22:40 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022):

IMO it doesn't make sense to display two potentially large tables one on top of the other. Viewing the VMs table would require the user to scroll through the entire devices table, assuming they even know it's there. Maybe child tabs (like for components under the device view) would be more suitable?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022): IMO it doesn't make sense to display two potentially large tables one on top of the other. Viewing the VMs table would require the user to scroll through the entire devices table, assuming they even know it's there. Maybe child tabs (like for components under the device view) would be more suitable?
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hagbarddenstore commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022):

I’d rather have it removed. The count links are much more useful anyway, since they allow you to filter on more properties.

@hagbarddenstore commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022): I’d rather have it removed. The count links are much more useful anyway, since they allow you to filter on more properties.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:41 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022):

@hagbarddenstore just an FYI, when you reply to an issue via email for some reason GitHub is tacking on the quoted portion of the message. Not sure why, as it seems to work fine for others. (I've been editing out the cruft as it pops up, which is why you'll see the "edited by" note on some of your comments.)

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022): @hagbarddenstore just an FYI, when you reply to an issue via email for some reason GitHub is tacking on the quoted portion of the message. Not sure why, as it seems to work fine for others. (I've been editing out the cruft as it pops up, which is why you'll see the "edited by" note on some of your comments.)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@ShellBoyAFK commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022):

sound good thx

@ShellBoyAFK commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2022): sound good thx
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@hagbarddenstore commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2022):

@hagbarddenstore just an FYI, when you reply to an issue via email for some reason GitHub is tacking on the quoted portion of the message. Not sure why, as it seems to work fine for others. (I've been editing out the cruft as it pops up, which is why you'll see the "edited by" note on some of your comments.)

Ah thanks. Seems to be an iOS thing (Or my incompetence...)

@hagbarddenstore commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2022): > @hagbarddenstore just an FYI, when you reply to an issue via email for some reason GitHub is tacking on the quoted portion of the message. Not sure why, as it seems to work fine for others. (I've been editing out the cruft as it pops up, which is why you'll see the "edited by" note on some of your comments.) Ah thanks. Seems to be an iOS thing (Or my incompetence...)
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023):

@jeremystretch I'd like to take this

@abhi1693 commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023): @jeremystretch I'd like to take this
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:42 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023):

@abhi1693 - All yours.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023): @abhi1693 - All yours.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7383
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?