starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add support for 800G interface types #7379

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:22:38 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:38 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @dare-to-recurse on GitHub (Dec 18, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @reishoku on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.4.1

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

Add the following options to the type selector

  • OSFP800 (800GE)
  • QSFP-DD800 (800GE)

The preferred names for the interface types according to the published specifications seems to be OSFP800 and QSFP-DD800 (though it remains to be seen if vendors diverge from this)

QSFP-DD800 specification (see page 1 - document title): http://www.qsfp-dd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/QSFP-DD-Hardware-Rev6.3-final.pdf
OSFP800 specification (see page 13): https://osfpmsa.org/assets/pdf/OSFP_Module_Specification_Rev5_0.pdf

Use case

800G interfaces/transceivers seem to be appearing on the market, and implementing support for these interface types enables accurate modeling of 800G connections.

Database changes

I don't believe this should require database changes.

External dependencies

None.

Originally created by @dare-to-recurse on GitHub (Dec 18, 2022). Originally assigned to: @reishoku on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.4.1 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality Add the following options to the type selector - OSFP800 (800GE) - QSFP-DD800 (800GE) --- The preferred names for the interface types according to the published specifications seems to be _OSFP800_ and _QSFP-DD800_ (though it remains to be seen if vendors diverge from this) QSFP-DD800 specification (see page 1 - document title): http://www.qsfp-dd.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/QSFP-DD-Hardware-Rev6.3-final.pdf OSFP800 specification (see page 13): https://osfpmsa.org/assets/pdf/OSFP_Module_Specification_Rev5_0.pdf ### Use case 800G interfaces/transceivers seem to be appearing on the market, and implementing support for these interface types enables accurate modeling of 800G connections. ### Database changes I don't believe this should require database changes. ### External dependencies None.
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 20:22:38 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:22:39 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@reishoku commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2023):

Hello @jeremystretch , I am willing to (open a PR to) add the support of QSFP-DD800 and OSFP-800 interface type to NetBox.

@reishoku commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2023): Hello @jeremystretch , I am willing to (open a PR to) add the support of QSFP-DD800 and OSFP-800 interface type to NetBox.
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:22:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2023):

@reishoku - All yours!

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2023): @reishoku - All yours!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7379
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?