starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add additional power connectors to better model UPS extended runtime enclousures #7307

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 20:21:34 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:21:34 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Dec 1, 2022).

NetBox version

v3.3.8

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

See : https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/discussions/11068

In discussing how to better model UPS extended runtime systems I notice there is no power connector type that allows us to model the connection between the extended runtime enclosure and the UPS. APC does not publish specifics, but looking at the following we can see it is likely a variation of an ANEN SA50B8-H.
https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/308713/what-is-this-connector-on-my-ups-called
https://www.andersonpower.com/content/dam/app/ecommerce/product-pdfs/SB50/ds-sb50.pdf

Submitting this feature request to add the ANEN SA50 connector type to power connectors to allow better/more accurate modeling of extended runtime systems as they connect to UPS's.

Use case

Add additional power connectors to : https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/dcim/choices.py#L595-L607

TYPE_ANDERSON_SB50 = 'anderson-sb50'

Database changes

None

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @ghost on GitHub (Dec 1, 2022). ### NetBox version v3.3.8 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality See : https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/discussions/11068 In discussing how to better model UPS extended runtime systems I notice there is no power connector type that allows us to model the connection between the extended runtime enclosure and the UPS. APC does not publish specifics, but looking at the following we can see it is likely a variation of an ANEN SA50B8-H. https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/308713/what-is-this-connector-on-my-ups-called https://www.andersonpower.com/content/dam/app/ecommerce/product-pdfs/SB50/ds-sb50.pdf Submitting this feature request to add the ANEN SA50 connector type to power connectors to allow better/more accurate modeling of extended runtime systems as they connect to UPS's. ### Use case Add additional power connectors to : https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/netbox/dcim/choices.py#L595-L607 > TYPE_ANDERSON_SB50 = 'anderson-sb50' ### Database changes None ### External dependencies None
adam added the type: featurepending closure labels 2025-12-29 20:21:34 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 20:21:34 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:21:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2023):

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. Do not attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our contributing guide.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2023): This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. NetBox is governed by a small group of core maintainers which means not all opened issues may receive direct feedback. **Do not** attempt to circumvent this process by "bumping" the issue; doing so will result in its immediate closure and you may be barred from participating in any future discussions. Please see our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md).
adam commented 2025-12-29 20:21:35 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2023):

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 2, 2023): This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label pending closure type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#7307
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?