starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Space utilization starts at 1.2% for a new rack #6891

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:46:25 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:46:25 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @abhi1693 on GitHub (Aug 27, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @arthanson on GitHub.

NetBox version

3.3.1

Python version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a new rack named Rack1
  2. Open the Rack1 detail page and notice the space utilization value

Expected Behavior

Space utilization for a new rack should always start at 0%

Observed Behavior

Space utilization starts at 1.2%

image

Originally created by @abhi1693 on GitHub (Aug 27, 2022). Originally assigned to: @arthanson on GitHub. ### NetBox version 3.3.1 ### Python version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a new rack named `Rack1` 2. Open the `Rack1` detail page and notice the space utilization value ### Expected Behavior Space utilization for a new rack should always start at 0% ### Observed Behavior Space utilization starts at 1.2% ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5083532/187031378-f404e70b-daf4-40a4-b954-d8c4ec6eb171.png)
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 19:46:25 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:46:25 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:46:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2022):

I believe it's caused by Rack.get_available_units() not returning 42.5 as a valid position in a 42 U rack but Rack.units does include 42.5 as a valid position. So available units in a 42 U rack will be 83 but the total units will be 84.

@kkthxbye-code commented on GitHub (Aug 27, 2022): I believe it's caused by Rack.get_available_units() not returning 42.5 as a valid position in a 42 U rack but Rack.units does include 42.5 as a valid position. So available units in a 42 U rack will be 83 but the total units will be 84.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:46:26 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@VitMain commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2022):

It is also related to the problem with reservations.
For example, we have a 46RU server cabinet, I reserved 1-46RU, and space utilization says that this cabinet is used only for 51.1%.

@VitMain commented on GitHub (Aug 29, 2022): It is also related to the problem with reservations. For example, we have a 46RU server cabinet, I reserved 1-46RU, and space utilization says that this cabinet is used only for 51.1%.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6891
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?