starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

DOCSIS Interface Type #6769

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @metalshark on GitHub (Aug 5, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

3.2.7

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Add an Interface Type for DOCSIS.

Use case

Being able to articulate a connection over DOCSIS between two devices.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @metalshark on GitHub (Aug 5, 2022). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version 3.2.7 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Add an Interface Type for DOCSIS. ### Use case Being able to articulate a connection over DOCSIS between two devices. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2022):

Looks like this was already discussed at length in #9229 (which was closed for inactivity) and the consensus was to add a single DOCSIS type as proposed here. Does it make sense to list this under a "Coaxial" type as proposed there?

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Aug 10, 2022): Looks like this was already discussed at length in #9229 (which was closed for inactivity) and the consensus was to add a single DOCSIS type as proposed here. Does it make sense to list this under a "Coaxial" type as proposed there?
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:45:14 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@metalshark commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2022):

That seems more than apt, yes. Thank you.

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 20:45, Jeremy Stretch @.***>
wrote:

Looks like this was already discussed at length in #9229
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/9229 (which was
closed for inactivity) and the consensus was to add a single DOCSIS type as
proposed here. Does it make sense to list this under a "Coaxial" type as
proposed there?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/9933#issuecomment-1211190433,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABD2FGN2ANXLDZRCC7H6ILVYQBETANCNFSM55WQ4ECA
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

@metalshark commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2022): That seems more than apt, yes. Thank you. On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 20:45, Jeremy Stretch ***@***.***> wrote: > Looks like this was already discussed at length in #9229 > <https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/9229> (which was > closed for inactivity) and the consensus was to add a single DOCSIS type as > proposed here. Does it make sense to list this under a "Coaxial" type as > proposed there? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/issues/9933#issuecomment-1211190433>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABD2FGN2ANXLDZRCC7H6ILVYQBETANCNFSM55WQ4ECA> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6769
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?