starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-12 05:20:31 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Units range in rack reservation return an empty field error if put in decreasing order #6708

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:44:20 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:44:20 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Zeawiel on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @DanSheps on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.2.7

Python version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a rack reservation
  2. Put a unit range with bigger number first (like 7-2)
  3. Click create

Expected Behavior

The reservation should be created with the good unit values or return a more explicit error.

Observed Behavior

Netbox gives an error like the field "Units" is empty.
It works if Units are given in the right order (2-7 here).

image

Originally created by @Zeawiel on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022). Originally assigned to: @DanSheps on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.2.7 ### Python version 3.10 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a rack reservation 2. Put a unit range with bigger number first (like 7-2) 3. Click create ### Expected Behavior The reservation should be created with the good unit values or return a more explicit error. ### Observed Behavior Netbox gives an error like the field "Units" is empty. It works if Units are given in the right order (2-7 here). ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6941618/180258604-d81617b3-23d3-4cae-84d5-5d80debe385d.png)
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 19:44:20 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:44:20 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:44:20 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 25, 2022):

I agree that the error message should be improved, however support for decreasing units was never intended so the validation failure is expected.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 25, 2022): I agree that the error message should be improved, however support for decreasing units was never intended so the validation failure is expected.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6708
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?