Can't go to cable by clicking on ID #6695

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:44:04 +01:00 by adam · 5 comments
Owner

Originally created by @PaulR282 on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022).

NetBox version

v3.3.0-beta1

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Go to a device with interfaces
  2. Create a Cable connected to e.g. a FP
  3. Click on the Cable ID in the Interface overview of the device

It also doesn't work if I click on the ID on any other page

Expected Behavior

Cable page should be shown

Observed Behavior

<class 'django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch'>

Reverse for 'cable_add' not found. 'cable_add' is not a valid view function or pattern name.

Python version: 3.9.5
NetBox version: 3.3.0-dev
Originally created by @PaulR282 on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022). ### NetBox version v3.3.0-beta1 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Go to a device with interfaces 2. Create a Cable connected to e.g. a FP 3. Click on the Cable ID in the Interface overview of the device It also doesn't work if I click on the ID on any other page ### Expected Behavior Cable page should be shown ### Observed Behavior ``` <class 'django.urls.exceptions.NoReverseMatch'> Reverse for 'cable_add' not found. 'cable_add' is not a valid view function or pattern name. Python version: 3.9.5 NetBox version: 3.3.0-dev ```
adam added the type: bugstatus: revisions neededbeta labels 2025-12-29 19:44:04 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:44:05 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022):

I'm not able to reproduce this behavior. Please try again using a current copy of the feature branch. If you are able to reproduce this, please amend your post above to provide exact instructions for doing so.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022): I'm not able to reproduce this behavior. Please try again using a current copy of the `feature` branch. If you are able to reproduce this, please amend your post above to provide *exact* instructions for doing so.
Author
Owner

@PaulR282 commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022):

I think I found the problem: the current feature tag from the docker hub is v3.3.0-dev and not v3.3.0-beta1.

@PaulR282 commented on GitHub (Jul 20, 2022): I think I found the problem: the current feature tag from the docker hub is v3.3.0-dev and not v3.3.0-beta1.
Author
Owner

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022):

Can you reproduce this on beta?

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022): Can you reproduce this on beta?
Author
Owner

@PaulR282 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022):

Can you reproduce this on beta?

Didn't have the chance to try the beta because I'm building an own image using the docker hub and the tags aren't up to date #9808

@PaulR282 commented on GitHub (Jul 21, 2022): > Can you reproduce this on beta? Didn't have the chance to try the beta because I'm building an own image using the docker hub and the tags aren't up to date #9808
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2022):

Sounds like this has likely already been resolved, so I'm going to close this. Happy to re-open if the issue resurfaces.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 22, 2022): Sounds like this has likely already been resolved, so I'm going to close this. Happy to re-open if the issue resurfaces.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6695