starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Custom field 'field type' and 'content types' filters do not work as expected #6627

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:43:16 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:43:16 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @pgnuta on GitHub (Jul 4, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.2.5

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

Define a selection of custom fields and then use the "field type" or "content type" filter to filter out the non-matching custom fields.

No filters applied shows all results:
image

Expected Behavior

In the case of the "field type" filter expected behaviour would be that only "Text" results would be shown
In the case of the "content type" filter expected behaviour would be that only custom fields that are applied to "tenancy | tenant" objects would be shown.

Observed Behavior

"Text" field type filter applied does not filter any of the non-text type results out.
image

"tenancy | tenant" content type filter applied removes all results.
image

Originally created by @pgnuta on GitHub (Jul 4, 2022). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.2.5 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce Define a selection of custom fields and then use the "field type" or "content type" filter to filter out the non-matching custom fields. No filters applied shows all results: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19255358/177139551-606b13c4-e320-4203-83d2-c490415cb6d7.png) ### Expected Behavior In the case of the "field type" filter expected behaviour would be that only "Text" results would be shown In the case of the "content type" filter expected behaviour would be that only custom fields that are applied to "tenancy | tenant" objects would be shown. ### Observed Behavior "Text" field type filter applied does not filter any of the non-text type results out. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19255358/177139645-81937411-023e-4c60-bef2-94c05fea40eb.png) "tenancy | tenant" content type filter applied removes all results. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/19255358/177139741-b7bd1ac1-2eac-4e46-baef-b731adaea463.png)
adam added the type: bugstatus: accepted labels 2025-12-29 19:43:17 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:43:17 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:43:17 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@julianstolp commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022):

I can reproduce it with 3.2.5 an Python 3.8.
Maybe its because the API-Endpoint is different from the input in the URL, which gets filled by the filterfunction.

There is no field type and the content_types field is expecting a string but gets an id.
If I use the filter ?content_types=dcim.interface it gets filtered correctly.

image

image

@julianstolp commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022): I can reproduce it with 3.2.5 an Python 3.8. Maybe its because the API-Endpoint is different from the input in the URL, which gets filled by the filterfunction. There is no field *type* and the *content_types* field is expecting a string but gets an id. If I use the filter ?content_types=dcim.interface it gets filtered correctly. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/41152397/177312567-aa329ed4-6465-4fda-9a66-51bd79ad4b57.png) ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/41152397/177312272-cfdd25be-7934-4066-bb15-1918e2d7d45a.png)
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:43:17 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2022):

The webhooks list in the UI is affected by the same bug. The issue is that the filter form is using the wrong filter name.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 8, 2022): The webhooks list in the UI is affected by the same bug. The issue is that the filter form is using the wrong filter name.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6627
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?