Possibility to reconnect cable #6626

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:43:16 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @heiko-ma on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022).

NetBox version

v3.2.5

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

When connecting two ports with a cable, there is no possibility to change the target port without the deleting the cable and therefore loose all information (color, length type).

I propose creating a button (similar to the remove cable button) which opens the same UI as in the cable creation dialog just with the cable informations filled out. When confirming the dialog, the old cable would be deleted and a new one with the new target device created.

I realize this is just a shortcut to deleting the old cable and creating the new one but it would save some (in my opinion) unnecessary clicks)

Use case

In the real world, it isn't uncommon that devices get swapped out through new ones and existing cables are reused. When changing a device with a greater amount of ports, it would be beneficial if the UI workflow would be more fluid.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @heiko-ma on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022). ### NetBox version v3.2.5 ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality When connecting two ports with a cable, there is no possibility to change the target port without the deleting the cable and therefore loose all information (color, length type). I propose creating a button (similar to the **remove cable** button) which opens the same UI as in the cable creation dialog just with the cable informations filled out. When confirming the dialog, the old cable would be deleted and a new one with the new target device created. I realize this is just a shortcut to deleting the old cable and creating the new one but it would save some (in my opinion) unnecessary clicks) ### Use case In the real world, it isn't uncommon that devices get swapped out through new ones and existing cables are reused. When changing a device with a greater amount of ports, it would be beneficial if the UI workflow would be more fluid. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 19:43:16 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:43:16 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022):

We're not currently accepting any new feature requests for cabling as it is being entirely overhauled for v3.3 (see #9102). You're welcome to try out the v3.3 beta when it is released this week or next, and provide your feedback. (Please note that no major changes will be made after the final release, so be sure to try out the beta.)

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jul 5, 2022): We're not currently accepting any new feature requests for cabling as it is being entirely overhauled for v3.3 (see #9102). You're welcome to try out the v3.3 beta when it is released this week or next, and provide your feedback. (Please note that no major changes will be made after the final release, so be sure to try out the beta.)
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6626