Modules with Frontport get error in v3.2 beta 2 #6264

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:38:41 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @rodewalder on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.2.0-beta2

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a Module Type with Rear and Front ports
  2. Add a module in a device module bay
  3. Click create and you get "<class 'dcim.models.device_components.RearPort.DoesNotExist'>"

Expected Behavior

The module create work with rear and front port. I use it for modular patchboxes.

Observed Behavior

Module Types with interface or only rear ports work, but if a module type has front port it fails

Originally created by @rodewalder on GitHub (Mar 26, 2022). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.2.0-beta2 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a Module Type with Rear and Front ports 2. Add a module in a device module bay 3. Click create and you get "<class 'dcim.models.device_components.RearPort.DoesNotExist'>" ### Expected Behavior The module create work with rear and front port. I use it for modular patchboxes. ### Observed Behavior Module Types with interface or only rear ports work, but if a module type has front port it fails
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedbeta labels 2025-12-29 19:38:41 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:38:41 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2022):

I'm not able to reproduce this on the current feature branch. It's possible that the bug has been resolved inadvertently in a recent change. If you are still able to reproduce the issue, please update your post above to include exact reproduction instructions.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2022): I'm not able to reproduce this on the current `feature` branch. It's possible that the bug has been resolved inadvertently in a recent change. If you are still able to reproduce the issue, please update your post above to include **exact** reproduction instructions.
Author
Owner

@rodewalder commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2022):

If I use for example as rear port {module}/mpo and as frontport {module}/mpo it runs into the error.
If I use the rear port without {module} it works.
There are a problem to setup the front and resr port connection when the module will be created. The right name for the rear port is not available.

@rodewalder commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2022): If I use for example as rear port {module}/mpo and as frontport {module}/mpo it runs into the error. If I use the rear port without {module} it works. There are a problem to setup the front and resr port connection when the module will be created. The right name for the rear port is not available.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6264