starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

netbox-v3.2-beta1 - Cannot create new device bay on device or device-type #6168

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00 by adam · 4 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @pobk on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.2-beta1

Python version

3.8

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create a device type or use an existing
  2. Open "+Add component" -> "Device Bay"
  3. Fill in form. I used "iLO" for name and label and added some fluff in description.
  4. Click "Create"

Expected Behavior

I would expect a new device bay is created on the device or device-type and I'm redirected to the device-bays tab of the origin device/device-type.

Observed Behavior

You're redirected to the device tab, however, the device bay list is empty.

Originally created by @pobk on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022). Originally assigned to: @jeremystretch on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.2-beta1 ### Python version 3.8 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create a device type or use an existing 2. Open "+Add component" -> "Device Bay" 3. Fill in form. I used "iLO" for name and label and added some fluff in description. 4. Click "Create" ### Expected Behavior I would expect a new device bay is created on the device or device-type and I'm redirected to the device-bays tab of the origin device/device-type. ### Observed Behavior You're redirected to the device tab, however, the device bay list is empty.
adam added the type: bugstatus: acceptedbeta labels 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pobk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

This is reproducable on the demo-beta.netbox.dev instance.

@pobk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): This is reproducable on the demo-beta.netbox.dev instance.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

Thanks for the report! It looks like what's happening is that the component form validation is failing (likely because the chosen device type doesn't have the "parent" role to allow the assignment of device bays), but the view is redirecting the user as if the form submission was successful.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): Thanks for the report! It looks like what's happening is that the component form validation is failing (likely because the chosen device type doesn't have the "parent" role to allow the assignment of device bays), but the view is redirecting the user as if the form submission was successful.
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:37:39 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@pobk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

Aha! Confirmed. I added 'parent' my test type and that works

@pobk commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): Aha! Confirmed. I added 'parent' my test type and that works
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:37:40 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022):

Fixed in 25dc9cc14a but I typo'd the commit message. 🤦

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 3, 2022): Fixed in 25dc9cc14aca2caaa1119ec4c36112027c33e5b9 but I typo'd the commit message. :facepalm:
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label beta status: accepted type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6168
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?