Visibility switcher for device image #6040

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:35:58 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @KosenkoIvan on GitHub (Feb 3, 2022).

NetBox version

nexbox (v3.1.5)

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

Vsibility switcher for device image.
7

Use case

It is necessary that the user decides for himself whether he needs to display the image in the rack or not. On the example of the Juniper device type, we see its image, but it is not needed in the rack. The visibility switch would solve this in 1 click.
4
5
6

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @KosenkoIvan on GitHub (Feb 3, 2022). ### NetBox version nexbox (v3.1.5) ### Feature type New functionality ### Proposed functionality Vsibility switcher for device image. ![7](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/152318246-19672501-526f-4c7a-8c82-386fc34f2627.png) ### Use case It is necessary that the user decides for himself whether he needs to display the image in the rack or not. On the example of the Juniper device type, we see its image, but it is not needed in the rack. The visibility switch would solve this in 1 click. ![4](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/152318294-03c91eea-2dd0-4e45-9a1e-0bcade1c12ab.PNG) ![5](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/152318296-563d2bc0-1ca3-405f-b3f4-a1871b2e2120.PNG) ![6](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/152318299-bd0ce13d-4cdb-407a-8885-cf6a656b9002.PNG) ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the type: featurestatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 19:35:58 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:35:58 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2022):

Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our contributing guide, a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2022): Thank you for your interest in extending NetBox. Unfortunately, the information you have provided does not constitute an actionable feature request. Per our [contributing guide](https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md), a feature request must include a thorough description of the proposed functionality, including any database changes, new views or API endpoints, and so on. It must also include a detailed use case justifying its implementation. If you would like to elaborate on your proposal, please modify your post above. If sufficient detail is not added, this issue will be closed.
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2022):

Closing this as no further information has been provided. And if the intent is to not display an image, just don't upload an image for the device type.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Mar 4, 2022): Closing this as no further information has been provided. And if the intent is to not display an image, just don't upload an image for the device type.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6040