starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-13 22:03:32 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add poe_enabled check box to dcim.interface #6021

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00 by adam · 3 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @davama on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022).

NetBox version

v3.1.6

Feature type

Data model extension

Proposed functionality

Similar to enabled which defines the state of the interface, I wish to add a new checkbox to show if poe is enabled/disabled on X interface.

Use case

How will it benefit?
It will provide more data to the user on the state of their network.
What need does it address?
Currently there is no location where one can store the POE state of an interface, so this would add that.

poe_enabled

Database changes

ALTER TABLE dcim_interface ADD COLUMN "poe_enabled" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE ;
commit

External dependencies

None

Originally created by @davama on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022). ### NetBox version v3.1.6 ### Feature type Data model extension ### Proposed functionality Similar to `enabled` which defines the state of the interface, I wish to add a new checkbox to show if poe is enabled/disabled on X interface. ### Use case How will it benefit? It will provide more data to the user on the state of their network. What need does it address? Currently there is no location where one can store the POE state of an interface, so this would add that. ![poe_enabled](https://i.imgur.com/XHAVwE7.png) ### Database changes ``` ALTER TABLE dcim_interface ADD COLUMN "poe_enabled" BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE ; commit ``` ### External dependencies None
adam added the type: feature label 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@davama commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

Please let me know if i missed anything on this request.
Thank you for the awesome support!

@davama commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): Please let me know if i missed anything on this request. Thank you for the awesome support!
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

Anything regarding PoE should be covered under FR #1099 (currently planned for v3.3). I want to avoid adding anything ahead of the "full" implementation so as not to constrain ourselves with its design unnecessarily. Thanks for the FR though!

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): Anything regarding PoE should be covered under FR #1099 (currently planned for v3.3). I want to avoid adding anything ahead of the "full" implementation so as not to constrain ourselves with its design unnecessarily. Thanks for the FR though!
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:48 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@davama commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

Didnt know that FR one existed
Looks more complete.
Looking forward to it!

@davama commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): Didnt know that FR one existed Looks more complete. Looking forward to it!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#6021
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?