Wrong switching order #5981

Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:35:07 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @KosenkoIvan on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022).

NetBox version

nexbox (v3.1.5)

Python version

3.7

Steps to Reproduce

On the 1st screenshot we see the correct number order 2.3-(1-22)
1
But when we go to the rack 2.3-1 and press next
2
we see that the rack number is 2.3-12, although it should be 2.3-2
3
etc
4

Expected Behavior

Must be in the correct nominal order.
2.3-1
2.3-2
2.3-3
...

Observed Behavior

2.3-1
2.3-12
2.3-13

Originally created by @KosenkoIvan on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022). ### NetBox version nexbox (v3.1.5) ### Python version 3.7 ### Steps to Reproduce On the 1st screenshot we see the correct number order 2.3-(1-22) ![1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/150498585-1a961812-6235-4a13-811c-3ec8a7043ea5.png) But when we go to the rack 2.3-1 and press next ![2](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/150498591-ec802959-9bfa-4ecb-b2d9-5498ba619198.png) we see that the rack number is 2.3-12, although it should be 2.3-2 ![3](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/150498593-3d79f8ca-d404-427c-859a-e74463719d5a.png) etc ![4](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/97949308/150498595-685e4716-e140-406c-94ba-37e3a4190f8a.png) ### Expected Behavior Must be in the correct nominal order. 2.3-1 2.3-2 2.3-3 ... ### Observed Behavior 2.3-1 2.3-12 2.3-13
adam added the type: bugstatus: revisions needed labels 2025-12-29 19:35:07 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:35:07 +01:00
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022):

Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2022): Thank you for opening a bug report. Unfortunately, the information you have provided is not sufficient for someone else to attempt to reproduce the reported behavior. Remember, each bug report must include detailed steps that someone else can follow on a clean, empty NetBox installation to reproduce the exact problem you're experiencing. These instructions should include the creation of any involved objects, any configuration changes, and complete accounting of the actions being taken. Also be sure that your report does not reference data on the public NetBox demo, as that is subject to change at any time by an outside party and cannot be relied upon for bug reports.
Author
Owner

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2022):

Closing as there has been no further response.

@jeremystretch commented on GitHub (Feb 1, 2022): Closing as there has been no further response.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5981