starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Circuit Site not moving when moving device #5977

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:35:05 +01:00 by adam · 1 comment
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:05 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @Zeawiel on GitHub (Jan 20, 2022).

NetBox version

v3.1.6

Python version

3.9

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Create site A
  2. Create site B
  3. Create Device on site A
  4. Create Circuit on Site A
  5. Connect Terminiation A from circuit to Device
  6. Move Device to Site B

(Tested on demo)

Expected Behavior

The Circuit should move to Site B with Device

Observed Behavior

The Circuit is still terminating to Site A, but still connected to the device on Site B.

I don't know if this is a bug, maybe in some case this behavior is expected. What do you think ?
I see this problem because I'm moving from several Sites to one Site with multiple Location.

Originally created by @Zeawiel on GitHub (Jan 20, 2022). ### NetBox version v3.1.6 ### Python version 3.9 ### Steps to Reproduce 1. Create site A 2. Create site B 3. Create Device on site A 4. Create Circuit on Site A 5. Connect Terminiation A from circuit to Device 6. Move Device to Site B (Tested on demo) ### Expected Behavior The Circuit should move to Site B with Device ### Observed Behavior The Circuit is still terminating to Site A, but still connected to the device on Site B. I don't know if this is a bug, maybe in some case this behavior is expected. What do you think ? I see this problem because I'm moving from several Sites to one Site with multiple Location.
adam added the type: bug label 2025-12-29 19:35:05 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:35:06 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:35:06 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2022):

The site on the circuit is independant of the device. This is expected behaviour and if you want to see this changed we would need a FR for it.

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2022): The site on the circuit is independant of the device. This is expected behaviour and if you want to see this changed we would need a FR for it.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label type: bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5977
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?