starred/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2026-01-11 21:10:29 +01:00
Code Issues 273 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Add Cisco StackWise-80/-160/-320/-480 interface types #5894

New Issue
Closed
opened 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00 by adam · 2 comments
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Originally created by @michaelklose on GitHub (Jan 6, 2022).

Originally assigned to: @bluikko on GitHub.

NetBox version

v3.1.4

Feature type

Change to existing functionality

Proposed functionality

Currently NetBox already supports the interface types Cisco StackWise and Cisco StackWise Plus please also add newer StackWise types named StackWise-80, StackWise-160, StackWise-320 and StackWise-480

For reference:
StackWise-80 (used e.g. Catalyst 9200L)
StackWise-160 (used e.g. Catalyst 3650/9200)
StackWise-320 (used e.g. Catalyst 9300L)
StackWise-480 (used e.g. Catalyst 3850/9300)
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9300-series-switches/white-paper-c11-741468.html
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3650-series-switches/data_sheet-c78-729449.html
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9200-series-switches/nb-06-stackwise-architecture-cte-en.html#_Toc13521191

Use case

New interfaces types to model connections between switch stacks.

Database changes

No response

External dependencies

No response

Originally created by @michaelklose on GitHub (Jan 6, 2022). Originally assigned to: @bluikko on GitHub. ### NetBox version v3.1.4 ### Feature type Change to existing functionality ### Proposed functionality Currently NetBox already supports the interface types Cisco StackWise and Cisco StackWise Plus please also add newer StackWise types named StackWise-80, StackWise-160, StackWise-320 and StackWise-480 For reference: StackWise-80 (used e.g. Catalyst 9200L) StackWise-160 (used e.g. Catalyst 3650/9200) StackWise-320 (used e.g. Catalyst 9300L) StackWise-480 (used e.g. Catalyst 3850/9300) https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9300-series-switches/white-paper-c11-741468.html https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-3650-series-switches/data_sheet-c78-729449.html https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9200-series-switches/nb-06-stackwise-architecture-cte-en.html#_Toc13521191 ### Use case New interfaces types to model connections between switch stacks. ### Database changes _No response_ ### External dependencies _No response_
adam added the status: acceptedtype: feature labels 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00
adam closed this issue 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2022):

@bluikko Going to ping you to see if I can assign it. Nope

@DanSheps commented on GitHub (Jan 7, 2022): ~~@bluikko Going to ping you to see if I can assign it.~~ Nope
adam commented 2025-12-29 19:33:57 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

@bluikko commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2022):

Heh, please excuse me. I was actually looking for this feature myself and went ahead.

@bluikko commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2022): Heh, please excuse me. I was actually looking for this feature myself and went ahead.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
beta
breaking change
complexity: high
complexity: low
complexity: medium
needs milestone
netbox
pending closure
plugin candidate
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 severity: high
severity: low
severity: medium
status: accepted
status: backlog
status: blocked
status: duplicate
status: needs owner
status: needs triage
status: revisions needed
status: under review
topic: GraphQL
topic: Internationalization
topic: OpenAPI
topic: UI/UX
topic: cabling
topic: event rules
topic: htmx navigation
topic: industrialization
topic: migrations
topic: plugins
topic: scripts
topic: templating
topic: testing
type: bug
type: deprecation
type: documentation
type: feature
type: housekeeping
type: translation
No Label status: accepted type: feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
adam
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: starred/netbox#5894
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?